Yes the general theory says increasing heat input will reduce the impact values. But the feedback from the consumable manufacturer is because of low heat input PQR fails. He is suggesting to increase the heat input for better values. Manufacturer feedback is somehow contradictory. Now can't proceed further without correct root cause.
One more thing, can welding consumable with more nickel content will satisfy the requirement?
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/3acbea4c-b032-4b0e-8664-4138b86f7d33%40googlegroups.com.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? ...
-
Definition of buttering from ASME Section IX, QW/QB-492 Definitions: Buttering: the addition of material, by welding, on one or bot...
-
Section I. PRINT READING 3-1. GENERAL a. Drawings . Drawing or sketching is a universal language used to convey all necessary information to...
No comments:
Post a Comment