Skip to main content

[MW:29974] RE: 29965] Impact test fails FCAW process

Hi,

 

Please see the attached, info on typical FCAW consumable conforming to AWS E71 T12 CJ specifications. Qualifying PQR with FCAW process  on 70mm thk plates with PWHT and with impact @-46 Deg C is not easy. Following areas should need attention:-

 

·         Impact values of the consumable, qualification position , 1G or 3G?

·         If required ask the consumable manufacturer for impact results in 3G position.

·         Your coupon passed in 2G, that's due to the stringer bead technique and lower heat input, what were the recorded heat input??

·         Any data on results of the similar product with PWHT(ask consumable manufacturer).

·         In order to have a good and consistent impact 1.2.-1.4% Mn or more would be desirable. However in case of hardness restrictions, Manganese have to be restricted.

·         Last of shielding gas, for consistent -46 Deg C impact on 70mm thk coupons, use  of mixed gas, 80/20 Argon+CO2 or better(90/10).  Would be advisable.

 

Thanks.

 

P.Goswami.P.Eng, IWE.

Independent  & Consulting Welding & Metallurgical Specialist

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/pradip-goswami-2999855/

Email:pgoswami@quickclic.net,pradip.goswami@gmail.com

Cell/Whasapp:1-905-9793232

 

-----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of chakotevishal47@gmail.com
Sent: August 18, 2019 12:38 PM
To: Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [MW:29965] Impact test fails FCAW process

 

Dear experts,

We have carried out FCAW WPQR with PWHT. Welding consumable is E71 T12 CJ. Below are the conditions

 

Test coupon thk- 70 mm

Parent material- S355 G8+N

Process- FcAW

Welding consumable- E71T-12CJ

PWHT Temp- 580 deg C

Soaking time - 280 minutes

Impact test temp- minus 40 deg C

Heat input range (root)- 1.0-1.6 KJ/mm

Heat input range (cap)- 1.0-1.4 KJ/mm

Thermal efficiency- 0.8

Welding position-3G

 

 

The above welding consumable is recommended for PWHT.

 

The impact values are too low at root as well as cap.

 

Energy values- 16,15,25 J (root)

Energy values- 30,30,31 J (cap)

 

Can you please focus on impact values failure reasons?

 

Even if keeping low heat inputs the test has failed.

 

What could be the possible reasons of failure?

 

And with the same conditions WPQR passed with 2G position.

 

Please focus on possible reasons.

 

Regards,

 

Vishal

 

--

https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787

---

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/f1bead3a-d789-461c-a010-2e501ebb1e19%40googlegroups.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...