Tuesday, July 9, 2019

Re: [MW:29802] PWHT exemption for Pipe supports for amine service

PWHT shall be done.

Ramin  Kondori
Sr. QA/QC & Welding Engineer
-----------------------------------------------------------
PG-Dip. in Welding Engineering (IWE  AT  0070)
BSc. in Civil Engineering (IUT)
BGAS Painting Inspector
ASNT Level I&II
                        
IIW-Logo-Colour-small



On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:24 AM N VENKATESWARA PRASAD <weldengr.velosi@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Experts,

The Primary supports are welded to pipe ( Carbon steel) and PWHT was not done for amine service.  All the butt welds have undergone PWHT.  PWHT issue was noticed after completion of commissioning.  As per API  945, residual stresses are one of the reason for amine cracking.  Please advise how we can convince client  that residual stresses due to pipe supports welding have no effect on amine cracking.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAL%3D4YYiBmE7g%3DvhJH0xboyNPYi8m%2BpPp%2BY7NbM54APzDaDMCNQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAEagfUhUfb-E_PFKKgTZtOiZT2EvJRiKXrBBTi8nP9o%2BQKsbpQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...