Dear Experts,
Kindly suggest a solution on case:
We need to make PQR of below joints and supplier is proposing a electrode mention below with reference to cost impact. Is it acceptable or not?
Welding joint 1 : A 537 Cl2 to A537 Cl2
Proposers electrode from supplier is E9018-M instead of E8018-G. Electrode E9018-M cost is lower than E8018-G as per supplier feedback.
Welding joint 2 : A537Cl2 to P355NH
Proposed electrode is E7018.
Impact requirement of both joint is -20 degree 32 Joule minimum and 40 Average.
Regards,
Jignesh
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/6F4D60A0-3B47-4564-9AF1-28B8DE98AEF4%40gmail.com.
Kindly suggest a solution on case:
We need to make PQR of below joints and supplier is proposing a electrode mention below with reference to cost impact. Is it acceptable or not?
Welding joint 1 : A 537 Cl2 to A537 Cl2
Proposers electrode from supplier is E9018-M instead of E8018-G. Electrode E9018-M cost is lower than E8018-G as per supplier feedback.
Welding joint 2 : A537Cl2 to P355NH
Proposed electrode is E7018.
Impact requirement of both joint is -20 degree 32 Joule minimum and 40 Average.
Regards,
Jignesh
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/6F4D60A0-3B47-4564-9AF1-28B8DE98AEF4%40gmail.com.
Comments