Friday, February 14, 2014

Re: [MW:20102] Effect of higher Copper content on Austenitic Stainless Steels base material

Hi Charley
 
Our job is a pressure vessel, MOC = 304L and the service is not for sulphuric acid, neither for elevated temp.
Its for a Nuclear Power Plant in India.
 
Our project specs. have restricted Copper content to 0.45% for ASS base materials. I was wondering what the reason could be for this.
 
Hence being from client side, I have kept the flanges and plates  of fabricator having Cu content greater than 0.45% on hold.
 
Regards
 
Prem Nautiyal
9769316004


On Friday, February 14, 2014 9:44 AM, Charley Sui <charleysui@gmail.com> wrote:
Prem,

Cu hasn't been traditionally added as alloying elements in austenitic stainless steel, this might be the reason why ASTM specs doesn't address Cu as a controlled element. due to an increased use of recycled SS and other Cu bearing alloys, elevated Cu content is observed but typically less than 1%.

Ahmad is right, Cu will increases the corrosion resistance against sulfuric acid (deliberately added in alloy 20 for such application), but Cu>0.8% may lead to hot shortness, some fabricators limit Cu below 0.5%.



On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:28 AM, prem nautiyal <prem_nautiyal26@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi all
 
Vessel fabricator has offered SS flanges- SA 182F 304L and SA 240TP 304L plates.
 
After reviewing Lab check test reports and MTC  it is observed that Copper content is 0.60% for flanges and 0.69 % for plates. Copper content limits are not specified in the standard and I feel that the copper content is Not Traces and on higher side.
 
I have seen the max limit for copper specified for welding consumables in ASME Sec II-C, SFA 5.4 / 5.9. as 0.75%, but for base materials it is not specified in ASME Sec II-A or ASTM - A182.
 
 
I have kept the flanges and plate on hold.
 
I would like to know the effect of higher copper content on the SS base material and the reason for addition in SS plates and forgings.
 
Regards
 
Prem Nautiyal
9769316004
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mailto:materials-welding%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:materials-welding%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
 
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


No comments:

Re: [MW:35289] Welding consumable for S355J2WP material

S355 J2 WP  is a weathering structural steel  It has better atmospheric corrosion resistance. Use E 8018 - W1/W2  Electrodes This is regular...