Wednesday, February 1, 2017

[MW:26009] Re: 26000] SAW hard facing flux

Thanks Mr. Goswami for your reply

Here are the details

Base metal is Mild steel plates of 8mm thickness grade IS 2062 and hardfacing alloy I am using is high carbon ferrochromium of 68% ferrochrome and 8 % carbon I am getting a weld deposit of approx 2 to 3% carbon and 15 to 20% chromium. 

What is the best way to mix flux as I also find lot of porosity in the end. 

regards



On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 6:28 AM, pgoswami <pgoswami@quickclic.net> wrote:

Hi ,

 

Your query is not specific, What's the base metal (substrate) and the hard facing alloy being considered for deposition? Could you be more specific?

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

Pradip Goswami, P.Eng,IWE
Welding & Metallurgical Engineering Specialist.

Ontario,Canada.
ca.linkedin.com/pub/pradip-goswami/5/985/299

pgoswami@quickclic.net

pradip.goswami@gmail.com

 

From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of AW
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 3:21 AM
To: Materials & Welding
Subject: [MW:26000] SAW hardfacing flux

 

I am struggling with hardness in my SAW hardfacing flux at present i use 68/8 HCFCR and still cant go beyond 52 HRC

--
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/0f198d60-f2f1-4b2a-aa0b-f798239ca51c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




--
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAKFoGhH%2B8yDgY%2B9Z2SOBy%2BWvC8ySeM%2Bxe%2BgXOpVP%3DTdOBda%2Biw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35006] Difference of 2% of Chromium Content on the Actual PMI VS Sec IIA

Sirs, Do we have supporting verses in ASME? Thanks On Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 5:58:42 PM UTC+8 Mohamed Ali wrote: Kindly get client specif...