Hi Raghuram, You were right about the olet's welding, there is always been a debate here on the extent of welding. Your Norsok M601 is one good reference. Please see below a different view from BP Spec (GIS 42-102), If set on integrally reinforced branch connections are used, it should be noted that the wall thickness of the connection may well be in excess of that necessary to provide the required level of reinforcement. Consequently, no reinforcement contribution is necessary from the weld metal, and the deposition of a branch weld with an excessive throat thickness may lead to unacceptable distortion of the main run pipe. The engineering design should provide guidance on the sizing of branch welds if using this type of fitting and on the need for controlled weld profiles if the branch is on severe cyclic duty. If set in integrally reinforced branch connections are used, fit up, jigging, and developing an overall welding sequence, should minimise the extent of any "sinking". The use of integrally reinforced branch connections on thin wall pipes, sch. 10 and below, should be avoided. Again it is open for debate, it will always be better to follow the recommendations from the client spec. when identified. When dispute arises then a proper analysis from engineering design can be supported, which again will be subject to the client's approval. Regards, Praveen A
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING) <R.Bathula@ticb.com> wrote:
From: Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING) <R.Bathula@ticb.com>
Subject: [MW:11527] RE: 1308] RE: 1307] Re: 1305] welding required on a (weldolet ) OLET(r) fitting
To: "'materials-welding@googlegroups.com'" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 2:00 PM
Pipe Fabrication Institute released PFI Standard ES-49, "Guideline for Installation of Integrally Reinforced Branch Outlet Fittings", which covers in detail the basic welding procedure and recommended weld deposit criteria for OLET® fittings. Additionally, B31.1 "Power Piping" revised, clarifying the governing criteria used for weld size determination and provides depictions of some acceptable weld profile for "Integrally Reinforced Branch Outlet Connections". The revisions are Paragraph 127.4.8 and the addition of Figure 127.4 .8 (E) showing acceptable details for integrally reinforced branch connections. From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING)
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:20 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:1308] RE: 1307] Re: 1305] welding reqd on a weldolet I am expecting multiple opinions on this issue from the group members but so far none?. please share your experience (no matter whether it is right or wrong after all we are just learning) , since it is long debated and yet not resolved issue. almost on every project I work for I have an issue with weldolet welding/distortion etc.. On many occasions in the past I have come across Weldolets which have not been fully welded out to the weld line. One in particular resulted in a near catastrophic failure. In general I find that contractors do not fully weld out weldolets to the weld line generally with the mis-conception that provided they have the same thickness as the branch wall they will be O.K. However they need to meet Thermal Stress Analysis requirements and not just Pressure reinforcement. I am neither a designer nor stress specialist bur considering Code" SIF's are lower than set-on branch SIF's since they are based upon the assumption that the Weldolet is fully welded out to the weld line. In not fully welding out the Weldolet then the actual SIF's are far greater than the "Code" values. The problem is that in many cases the Pipe Stress Engineer has assumed that the Weldolet is fully welded out whereas in fact the inspector approves cases where this has not occurred. My opinion is that Weldolets should be fully welded out always and if the parent pipe is so thin that distortion is a problem then use some other type of fitting. there are some client specifications indicate the the extent of weld required for olets for e.g NORSOK standard M-601 states "The weld bevel of O-lets shall be completely filled up to weld line on the O-lets. Smooth transition between the pipe and the O-lets is required. Notches below the weld line shall be avoided. Prior to welding, sufficient root gap shall be ensured" The problem is that olets are manufactured in a combination of diameter groupings to avoid inventory, resulting some of them will have the reinforcement at branching in excess of what is required. also it is because we get Sch40 fittings for sch10 run pipe, since bonny forge does n't have sch10 in their inventory, is n't it? and end up with more welding. simplest solution would be rather than going thro these complex geometry, we can choose a poorer solution such as with RF pad, after all we can calculate the required thk as per code is n't it? I hope some national/international code will be published soon on the olet geometry. -----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com]On Behalf Of HAREESH K V
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 4:25 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:1307] Re: 1305] welding reqd on a weldolet can we calculate the weld required based on asme B 31.3, the minimum reinforcement required for the branch opening. If so can you send one example calculation.
also how much weld should be done on a half coupling. On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Bathula Raghuram (Mumbai - PIPING) <R.Bathula@ticb.com> wrote: there is always heated debate on this between me and the vendors. in my opinion what ever is the bevel provided has to be completely filled since it compensates the area of opening (also called as crotch). also olet manufacturer (since they are the designers) should give these recommendations. you may check the burst test performed on these olets by mfrs, the minimum weld should be the one they welded during burst test. -----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com]On Behalf Of HAREESH K V
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:11 AM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:1305] welding reqd on a weldolet
I want to know how much welding reqd on a weldolet. My client is insisting me to weld the total slope (up to the middle of weldolet) on the weldolet. How the welding to be calculated?
Generally please suggest how much welding reqd on the OLETS.
If available can anyone send pictures of the same.
Regards
Hareesh
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
|
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment