Wednesday, July 27, 2011

[MW:11949] RE: 11946] CAN RE-HYDRO IS POSSIBLE/FOR JOINTERS INSIDE THE PLANT---HYDRO PRESSURE BAR WILL CHANGE?????

Hi,

 

Re hydro is suggestible – even documentation is available or not available.

Because as per code and general engineering practice each and every weld shall be subjected to hydro test as per the regular pressure ratings.

And that too you had done complete circumferential weld – which is also a critical one.

 

Further your welding process in the mid of the pipe will not alter the pressure test ratings. – you can go ahead with the regular testing pressure ranges.

Thanks and Regards................?

cid:image001.jpg@01CC3048.5836D9B0

Lakshman Kumar.B|Manager- QA/QC |Lanco Infratech Limited

Plot No 1255 | Sanjeevani chowk | Mahanadi vihar | Cuttack 753004

Phone : + 91 671 2445033 | Mobile : +91 9937286851 |www.lancogroup.com

Go Green|The future will thank you

Please note that my "Lanco group" mail is not working properly at some times, request you keep a copy to personal mail ID lakshmankumar4@gmail.com

 

From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of sajidalam mohd.
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:39 PM
To: prafull_vyas1@rediffmail.com; rupesh.jambhale@mottmac-india.com; mohd52100@gmail.com; Rupesh.Jambhale@mottmac-india.com; materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:11946] CAN RE-HYDRO IS POSSIBLE/FOR JOINTERS INSIDE THE PLANT---HYDRO PRESSURE BAR WILL CHANGE?????

 

DEAR ALL

              CAN WE DO RE-HYDRO FOR SHORTH LENGTH JOITED PIPED BEFORE RELEASE TO THE COATING PLANT?

 

MANUFACTURER IS SAYING THEY HAVE APPROVAL FROM CLIENTS.BUT WHEN I CHECKED THAT APPROVAL THAT IS ONLY FOR WELDING.NOTHING WRITTEN IN THAT APPROVAL ABOUT UT/X RAY/HYDRO ETC.TILL NOW THEY DIDN'T SUBMITTED ME APPROVED ITP.

 

BUT MANUFACTURER IS DOING 100% X RAY OF THAT JOINTED PORTION OF SHORTH LENGTH PIPES.BUT THEY ARE NOT READY TO DO RE HYDRO

MY CLIENT IS SAYING FOR RE-HYDRO BEFORE RELEASE.

 

IT ALSO MENTIONED IN API 5 L 44TH ADITION CLAUSES 9.4.2. PAGE NO. 29 STATES THAT THE JOINTERS NEED NOT BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED, PROVIDED THAT THE PROTIONS OF PIPES USED IS MAKING THE JOINTERS WERE SUCCESSFULLY HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED PRIOR TO THE JOINING OPERATION.

 

WHILE DURING MANUFACTURING THESE PIPES 72"DIAMETER X 15.88MM WALL THICNESSX GARADE X65.WELDING BY SAW PROCESS.

 

THAT TIME WE REJECTED SO MANY PIPES DUE TO DEFECTS SO MANY PIPES BECOME SHORTH LENGTH AFTER REMOVAL THE DEFECTED PORTIONS.

 

NOW MANUFACTURER HAS APPROVAL FOR JOINT TWO SHORT LENGTH PIPES (DEFECTS FREE PORTION) AND THEY ARE DOING WELDING BY SAW/SMAW PROCESS.

 

WHEN MANUFACTURER WAS DOING WELDING BY SAW PROCESS AS PER CLIENT SPECIFICATION/API 5L HYDRO PRESSUR BAR WAS 74 BARS.

 

I AM ASKING BECAUSE MANUFACTURE IS DOING WELDING OF SHORTH LENGTH PIPES BY SMAW/SAW PROCESS (THAT IS CIRCUMFERRENTIAL WELD) IF NOW CLIENT IS REQUESTING FOR RE-HYDRO FOR TWO SHORT LENTH JOINTED PIPES.

 

IT IS POSSIBLE FOR RE HYDRO FOR CICUMFERENTIAL WELD FOR TWO SHORT LENGTH PIPES THAT IS WELDED BY SMAW/SAW PROCES.

 

 

AFTER CIRCUMFERENTIAL WELD BY SAW/SAMW PRESSURE BAR WILL CHANGE???????/BECAUSE CLIENT IS SAYING FOR RE-HYDRO AFTER JOINTED OF SHORTH LENGTH PIPES.

 

REGARDS

MOHAMMAD SAZID ALAM

INSPECTION ENGINEER

KUWAIT

00966534077860

 

 

 

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

[MW:34916] Applicability of Impact requirement as per ASME B31.3

Dear All, Design code – ASME B31.3, Welding Code- ASME BPVC SEC IX Material  to be used used during Fabrication - SA 333Gr6 (P No.1 G...