Before concluding further, check up service condition, process fluid, last but not least, root cause and solution for improper support for WNRF.
F 316L is compitable to weld with 304L ( pipe material), with proper consumable.
With Best Regards,
Jignesh R Rana
Manager - Materials Technology, QA/QC & Standards(ENM)
Linde AG
Linde Engineering Division
Dr.-Carl-von-Linde-Str. 6 - 14
82049 Pullach / Germany
phone: +49 89 7445 - 2360
fax: +49 89 7445 - 4952
e-mail: jignesh.rana@linde-le.com
web: http://www.linde.com
___
This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. You should not disclose its contents to any other person nor use it for any purposes.
| "k.ilangkumaran ilangkumaran" <k.ilangkumaran@yahoo.com> Sent by: materials-welding@googlegroups.com 18.05.11 06:45
|
|
| Dear experts, Our existing weldneck flange butt weld failed due to improper support provided and we decided to replace it. Now the existing one is SA182 Type F304L due to unavailability of this we decide to replace it with readily available SA182 Type 316L. PNO & GROUP NO remain same for both the flanges as per section IX. Is it compatible in terms of weldability and its intend service or what will be the consequences if its welded? or should we use only type F304L? Can somebody explain me? Regards Ilangkumaran |
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment