Skip to main content

Re: [MW:35701] PT inspection after Grinding a Weld Seam?


Your concern is valid. Grinding a weld surface down to the depth indicated by PAUT before performing a Penetrant Test (PT) can indeed

risk smearing or partially closing the crack surface. Grinding down to the PAUT-indicated crack depth before PT can cause smearing that 

partially closes cracks, making PT less effective and potentially leading to false negatives.

To avoid this:

Use a low force (a lower grind pressure) and avoid overheating during final grinding to minimise smearing. Employing the bleed-back 

technique (i.e., after applying developer in PT, wiping the area and reapplying developer can help reveal cracks if there is still an open path 

to the surface. If the indication reappears, further light grinding may be needed to reopen cracks before performing the PT. Interpret PT 

results with caution after grinding and confirm with ultrasonic methods if needed. 

This combined approach ensures more reliable detection of weld cracks and reduces the risk of missing critical defects. 

C Sridhar.


On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 22:24, Mohamed Arbaoui <eng.arbaoui@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Members,

I have a question since I'm a beginner in this domain.


After a weld inspection by PAUT, a crack was detected at a certain depth. I noticed that the welders grind down the weld surface until they reach the depth indicated by PAUT, and then apply a PT test.
My concern is: isn't there a risk that the grinding process may partially close or smear the crack surface, making it harder for the PT liquid to penetrate and properly reveal the defect?

If so, this could mean that PT might give a false result, and the crack would only be detected later when PAUT is reapplied after re-welding.

Am I misunderstanding the procedure? What is the best practice in this case?

Thanks,

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAPkLCPCL2hOdFw0rDsd9TnRf60vC7YDwYhFib8g%2BujNVkSDerg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHo%3DYijexdzSpkV%3Dsv95HjUJC3_3%2B0UoJVSWGnixuZj7b7ey7Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

The Schaeffler and Delong diagrams for predicting ferrite levels in austenitic stainless steel welds

Introduction Ferrite is important in avoiding hot cracking in during cooling from welding of austenitic stainless steels. 'Constitution diagrams' are used to predict ferrite levels from the composition by comparing the effects of austenite and ferrite stabilising elements. The Schaeffler and Delong diagrams are the original methods of predicting the phase balances in austenitic stainless steel welds. Nickel and chromium equivalents A 'nickel equivalent' is calculated for the austenite stabilising elements and a 'chromium equivalent' ferrite stabilising elements. These are used as the axes for the diagrams, which show the compositional equivalent areas where the phases austenite, ferrite, martensite (and mixtures of these) should be present. Although intended to show the phase balance of weld fillers, these diagrams can also be used to illustrate the phase balance of the 'parent' material. There are different diagrams for dif...