Skip to main content

Re: [MW:6105] disimilar welding

Dear All,
 
 
It is conformed that chip back is not possible so, we have to do the welding with either by ER309L+E309L or by ERNiCr-3+ENiCrFe-3.
 
If there is a restriction on ferrite No. (Generally 3 - 8 FN) for austanitic stainless steel weld then we have to use Inconel because with SS309L the ferrite limit can not be achieved at required level.
 
 
Regards,
Bhavesh Patel

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:33 AM, <jignesh.rana@linde-le.com> wrote:

Dear All,

Fully agree with Mr. Raghuram's feedback.

At the same time, like to draw the attention to guidelines given by API.  

API 582 Clause no. 6.2.2 further restricts use of Ni based electrodes as per following design temperature.


Electrrode               Max, Design Temp ( Non -Sulphur Environment)                         Max Desing Temp. ( sulphur Environment)

E NiCrFe3                 540 C                                                                                                               370 C
ERNiCr3                    760 C                                                                                                               400C                
ENiCrFe2                  760 C                                                                                                               400C
ERNiCrMo3              590 C                                                                                                               590C

With Best Regards,

Jignesh R Rana
Manager - QA & QC

Linde Engineering India Pvt. Ltd.
38, Nutan Bharat Society, Alkapuri, Vadodara 390007, India
Tel.: +91 265 3056789, Fax: +91 265 2335213 , Mobil:  +91 90999 86019
jignesh.rana@linde-le.com, www.linde-india.com

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. You should not disclose its contents to any other person nor use it for any purposes.





Raghuram Bathula <raghurambathula@gmail.com>
Sent by: materials-welding@googlegroups.com

22/07/10 20:10


To
materials-welding@googlegroups.com
cc
Subject
Re: [MW:6082] disimilar welding





it depends on various parameters like thickness involved, code of construction and design conditions.
If DT>315 °C or PWHT is involved Inconel is preferred.

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Kavathekar, Sachin <Sachin.Kavathekar@jacobs.com> wrote:

Clad thk is 3mm.
But why Inconel?

Regards,
Sachin A Kavathekar.


-----Original Message-----
From:
materials-welding@googlegroups.com
[mailto:
materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of B.Raghuram
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:32 PM
To:
materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [MW:6076] disimilar welding

What is you clad thickness? If there no restriction from process point of
view, weld full thick by 309, or Inconel.

sent from my handheld
-----Original Message-----
From: Muhammed Ibrahim PK
Sent:  22/07/2010 4:29:14 pm
Subject:  Re: [MW:6075] disimilar welding

Hi,

They have to do carbon steel buttweld first.
Then clad restoration of the joint with 309LMO Barrier layer and 316L for
subsequent layer.

Thanks & Regards
Muhammed Ibrahim PK



On 22 July 2010 13:37, Kavathekar, Sachin
<
Sachin.Kavathekar@jacobs.com>wrote:

>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> My site contractor to do pipe long seam welding of SA516 GR. 70 + SS316
> cladded plate material. Back chip is not accessible of this joint.
>
>
>
> They have query, if first complete SS316 welding by using 316 electrode/
> filler wire & subsequent layer will be E- 309MO & E- 7018.
>
>
>
> Is it acceptable? I think they should do welding with E- 309MO up to carbon
> steel after  316 welding.
>
>
> Please advice.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sachin A Kavathekar

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.


--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...