Saturday, July 3, 2010

Re: [MW:5843] PMI using Spectroscopr JR on SDSS(F53) flanges

Sathyaprakash,

there should be no metallurgical problems with this as the depth of penetration of the spark is very small. It would never have been any use as a met tool if the testing caused metallurgical damage.......I had one of these some years ago and just used a file or some emery paper to remove most of the marks. XRF is definitely a better tool to use as you probably know it leaves no marks. Removing the sparks should not cause you any problems as they are just cosmetic in this instance.

regards

Declan

On 03/07/2010 08:29, TK, Sathyaprakash wrote:

One of our flange vendors have used Sptroscope JR  for performing PMI on SDSS (ASTM A182 F53) flanges.

It is violating two of our requirements

1.       Our purchase requisitions wants vendor to remove any PMI marks before supplying the items to us, vendor did not comply

2.       Our construction specification  allows us only XRF machines for PMI, we did not take this into consideration while approving vendor’s  PMI procedure.

 

Vendor has advised the marks shall only be removed by grinding and their pickling and passivation which was shown as the last stage in the manufacturing ITP was not able to remove the marks.

 

Now that the items are at our site Please advise

1.       If there is any adverse metallurgical effect on the SDSS material because of the sparking on the surface?

2.       We have tried removing the spark marks by touching it by pencil grinder and is getting removed is that advisable?

 

 

Regards,

Sathyaprakash

 


_______________________________________________
This message, including any attachments, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or authorised to receive information on behalf of the recipient, please contact the sender by reply email, and delete all copies of this message. While we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure that this message and any attachments are free from viruses, we cannot guarantee that they are virus free and accept no liability for any damage caused by this message or any attachments. Messages sent or received through our networks may be monitored to ensure compliance with the law, regulation and/or our policies.
______________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5248 (20100703) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

Re: [MW:35289] Welding consumable for S355J2WP material

S355 J2 WP  is a weathering structural steel  It has better atmospheric corrosion resistance. Use E 8018 - W1/W2  Electrodes This is regular...