Re: [MW:26656] Normalising requirment

Dear All,

Normalizing is specified at the discretion of the designer OR customer specification for basic reason of acheving thr Dished end properties after forming equal to the specified 

material properties.

In case of Normalizing following to be taken care:

CASE A:

(No welding is provided in the formation of dished end)

1. Placement of equivalent material test coupon for Normalising with dished end (which has been bent along with Dished end to equal to one which Dished end has under gone.)

2. This test coupon has to under go atleast tensile test & results are expected to meet 

specified minimum value of MOC. 

CASE B:

(Where welding of ground joint is carried out prior to forming & Normalizing as specified in approved  design & drawing)

1. First qualify WPS as per ASME SEC.IX  with weld coupon involving Normalizing before start of the fabrication activities.

2. Now like above part 2 in case 1 put welded test coupon & test as per ASME SEC IX. Additional test coupon of plate material bent to equivalent percentage of dished end percentage elongation may be provided.

Complete testing as per parent MOC specification. 

Special Note: Following to be taken care:

1. At time MOC requires impact test as well.

2. For LAS MOC requires post weld heat maintenance.

3. Due to 2nd Normalising of original plate material it is observed that UTS value reduces. by 5 Kg/cm2 & hence at the ordering stage of plates at plate mill simulation test pieces for Normalising & for weld test coupon is added as additional requirements over &  above specification requirenents. 

Also additional plate coupons are ordered to carry out Material testing during fabrication as discussed above. 

Hence above is conclusion on the subject matter. The codes are minimum requirements & guidance but engineering judgement is left to the fabricator & customer who are following the construction codes. This notes are in forward of all standards, specifications & 

code books.

Thanks & Regards,
C.B.Kapadia,
9892633442

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 at 13:51, Varun Vvp

<vvp.varun@gmail.com> wrote:

gents,

With reference to normalising of dish end, how do i select the parameters? wiz heating rate and holding time??

Any reference? I cannot find any in ASME sec 8. Please help

On Friday, October 22, 2010 at 8:44:17 PM UTC+4, hegd...@isgec.com wrote:

As far as normlizing is concern
C ode is silent
Incase of dished end. Normalizing is recomended (for fibre elongation above 5 per ) to recrestalise the grain strucure. Perticularly for higher thk above 16mm
.However soaking time depends upon thk of plate where it is essential for complete phase transformation ( austenite)for through thk.
Also higher soaking time causes grain growth. Causes deteoration in uts which also depends upon chemistry of plate

) Its soaking time depends upon the mill recomendation ( given in tc) and plate thickness and simulation asked by fabricator for perticular plate w r t desire mech properties
on this basis mill produce the plate
Also soaking time to be given by fabricator is based on experience obtain by various simulation of MTC after normaliing verses test results
Higher soking time causes deteoration in UTS so soking time for CS plate is recomeded between 0.8 to 1 min per mm. To get adequet mech properties

CS Plate less than 16mm can be stress relieved if it is not HIC requirement

Regards
Hegde

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from !DEA

---

From: "sachin sankhe" <sachin...@rediffmail.com>

Sender: material...@ googlegroups.com

Date: 22 Oct 2010 15:49:14 -0000

To: materials_welding<materials- welding@googlegroups.com>

ReplyTo: material...@ googlegroups.com

Subject: [MW:7718] Normalising requirment

Hi,

As we all aware that ASME Sec VIII Div.1 do not speak on normalising requirement
Then when we say Normalising is done at 910 Deg.C and with holding time as 1mm/min, then what is the basis for the same.I mean acceptence code

Futher to this ASME Sec VIII Div1 says that if due to cold forming fibre elengoation is more than 5% then heat tretment as per UCS 56 to be done.However most of the client spec mention that normalising need to be carried out.
I feel that for small thk say 12-13 mm normalising is not appropriate and may warp the matereial.So in that case can we accept stress relieving?
In EIL spec normalising is mentioned above 16 mm if fibre elongation is more than 5%

Request you to clarify above query giving reference of code


Regards
Sachin
Regards
Sachin.Sankhe

--
To post to this group, send email to material...@ googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-weld...@ googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding. blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.