[MW:1475] RE: 1474] Re: Required API 650 personal for Bahrain

All info is available at api website

---

From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of G Padmanabhan
Sent: January 27, 2009 10:06 AM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:1474] Re: Required API 650 personal for Bahrain

Dear Shriram,
Where we can take API Training course in  India.

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 7:37 AM, SHRIRAM PURANIK <stpuranik@gmail.com> wrote:

There is as such no API 650 qualification. Its API 653. You can search list of qualified persons on www.api.org

 

Regards,

 

Shriram T Puranik

API 510, 570, 571, 577, 580, 653

 

 

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Rajesh Shetty <shettyrajeshbabu@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Friends,

 

Anybody knows person having API 650 qualifications ready to give service a company in Bahrain, for a short period?

 

Please send details if you know somebody

 

With Best Regards

Rajesh

00973 30934717

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ravi Ronanki <ravi.ronanki@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Friends,

 

 

Kindly let me know from which website or blogspot the fabrication tolerances for Pressure Parts and Structural Items can  free downloads be available.

 

The matter is urgent.

 

 

Regards,

 

 

R.Ravi

 

On 1/22/09, Charles Nelson II <charles.nelson.ii@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Muhammed,

 

In response to your question below, X-ray radiography is you best choice due to quality issues. 

 

The second question is slightly difficult to answer as each tube/generator has different characteristics, as also the film and geometric variables have.  In referencing one of my resources, a higher end X-ray tube rated at 400-450 kV could theoretically penetrate thickness up to roughly 300 mm.  The lower limit for 50 kV is approximately 20 mm.

 

I usually work with castings from 30 mm to approximately 75 mm, although, I primarily use digital radiography using a CMOS detector. 

 

A generally accepted method of ensuring acceptability of a method is to demonstrate required sensitivity (i.e. hole-type or wire-type image quality indicators) per referencing code. 

 

I have a colleague that is better accquainted with thinner materials.  I will forward him your question and I will email you if I can clarify practical limits.

Thank you,

Charles Nelson

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Muhammed Ibrahim <ibratech@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi friends,

 

Good morning,

 

I have a query regarding the radiography of aluminium.

 

X-ray or gamma ray is better for aluminium?

 

If x ray is better , what is the thickness range it can be done?

 

If gamma ray is better , what is the thickness range it can be done?
 

If anybody having the procedure, please forward

Thanks & Regards
Muhammed Ibrahim PK
 

--
Cheers

Rajesh B. Shetty
Bahrain

--
With Warm regards,

G.Padmanabhan
00967771103169

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete
this e-mail and destroy any copies.

Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other
than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---