It is unusual to adopt floating tube sheet type hxr for more than 70 bar(g). In such a case you should have the tube to tube sheet weld as Strength welded joint and you do not need to have so much trouble with test ring + gland follower etc since you can ensure the integrity of TTP weld joint by halogen/ Helium test.
If you can give me the fluids on both sides and design parameters, some other options can be there.
Regards,
tagore
Dear Mr Tagore,
Thanks a lot. I could visualize the way u suggested to test these type exchangers. My only worry is the test pressure for these hx. Some of these hx have a shell test pressure of 1000 psig and I am not sure if the rubber gasket will work. But will surely try to work out a solution accordingly.
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Regards,
Jignesh
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tirumala B N Tagore
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:59 AM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:725] Re: AET type exchanger test ring
Sub: Test ring arrangement for AET type Hxr shell side test to verify the Tube to tube sheet joint integrity
This is not unusual. You need to use gland follower + gland ring set the same way as done for S type to obtain leak tight joint on OD of floating tube sheet . Additionally the Bolt holes of floating tube sheet need to be provided with plugs . This can be achived by using Bolts + rubber O ring or Flat rubber ring gasket placed in between the bolt head & rear side ( shell side ) face of floating tube sheet .In this method the bolts need to be placed in to the bolt holes from rear side of Floating tube sheet and you can tighten the nut on to the bolt from tube side of tube sheet i.e., from front side. The only problem is that in the event of leak even at one bolt hole , we need to remove the gland ring+ follower and attend.
In some instances people use solid rubber cones attached to stud , place the stud entry from rear end so that conical rubber seats on to the bolt hole on rear side of tube sheet , tighetn the stud using a hex nut from front side. Care should be excersized not to damage the bonding of stud to solid rubber cone while tightening the stud .
At present I do not possses the sketches showing the above arrangements. But these are very normal practices in the industry.
In case any more information is needed one can contact me on my mobile +966562743138 on Thursdays and fridays.
Regards,
Tagore
On 4/20/08, Jignesh Patel <nacemail@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Friends,
I have seen few heat exchangers on this forum. I am an end user of heat exchangers in refinery. My query is related to test rings of exchangers.
One of our new units has AET type exchangers [pull through type]. These exchangers have a floating tubesheet [FTS] with bolt holes and the floating head cover [FHC] is directly bolted to the floating tubesheet. The problem with this is that we can't carry out shell test using a conventional test ring due to several bolt holes on the floating tubesheet. Conventional AES exchangers have backing rings pressing the FHC against the FTS.
I checked TEMA website and it says, test rings for such exchangers are possible and the bolt holes in the tubesheet need to be temporarily plugged. It also says refer to 4.13 (3) of TEMA. Unfortunately we don't have the latest edition of TEMA.
Does any one have experience with test rings [for shell test] for AET type exchangers? I would appreciate a generic drawing / scheme showing how to carry out shell test of such exchangers.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks and regards,
Jignesh
Kuwait
For your virus protection, any attachments should be considered uncontrolled unless they are identified in the text. The sender does not accept liability for any virus introduced by this email or any attachment.
<br
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
No comments:
Post a Comment