Friday, March 31, 2023

Re: [MW:34110] Can we skip lamination test

Dear Mr. Anand,

You can do it but it is advisable as a good engg. practice to get the UT done before welding to ensure free from cracks, lamination or segregations.

Thanks & regards,


C. R. GANDHI

On Wednesday, March 29, 2023 at 08:51:01 AM GMT+5:30, Anand Mathur <anand.mathur16@gmail.com> wrote:


Dear Experts,

In imergency can we get welding done, skipping lamination examination by ut? can it be cover up by complete ut examination after welding?

Please let me know.

Thanks and regards,

Anand

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHh2n5MEUcY3GwwW1nBcyhg4sfQa2%3DEprW%3D9Wa40Nzam0tvzJw%40mail.gmail.com.

Tuesday, March 28, 2023

[MW:34108] Can we skip lamination test

Dear Experts,

In imergency can we get welding done, skipping lamination examination by ut? can it be cover up by complete ut examination after welding?

Please let me know.

Thanks and regards,

Anand

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHh2n5MEUcY3GwwW1nBcyhg4sfQa2%3DEprW%3D9Wa40Nzam0tvzJw%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [MW:34107]

Hi Simple,
Get the hydrotest package flow chart and follow the requirements.

In other way plenty of requirements from procedure to til re instatement



On Tue, 28 Mar 2023, 13:43 Vishal Jaiswal, <vis469jaiswal70@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear All,
Please give suggestions about hydro testing 
Like what points check in it.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAF6t40-O1%2BBxM1ubaDsXBUxes3rYnwc1ExKUH_zenWpCtSJ1DQ%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHqH7yAqJuVnjgYJP4CM9niRHTZg9enyJ9UEuawD_FenhP0Urg%40mail.gmail.com.

[MW:34106]

Dear All,
Please give suggestions about hydro testing 
Like what points check in it.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAF6t40-O1%2BBxM1ubaDsXBUxes3rYnwc1ExKUH_zenWpCtSJ1DQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi, 
You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this. 
Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime. 
Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC. 

The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case). 

One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example. 

In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Without any mill PWHT) which is not address your simulated min condition. 

I assume that you have to speak with your forging mill so that they expose one item to your minimum PWHT that defined by you as MFR and then they should include both. Min and Max. 

Best Regards 
Ahmed Eissa 
002 01224816994 


On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 5:09 AM, Hammm jinooo
<jinoham51@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi 

Client has required 4 cycle for SA266 GR4N, They requested the certificate shall included all required test at both conditions, min and max simulated PWHT Cycles,
Our forging mill has issued MTC with mechanical property, before PWHT and after PWHT But they commented " test after SPWHT performed after 4 cycles(max condition-i think after 4 times we mentioned the result as after SPWHT) and missing test after min condition"(I think there is missing test result of min SPWHT condition)

Could anyone give us idea how to solve this issue and what test result shall be added 

Can we say min and max SPWHT? We performed 4 times of SPWHT as client's request.. 

what you guys think min SPWHT condition?

Regards,
ham

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/e0257065-b095-4a75-8729-26977b86f5a8n%40googlegroups.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/267395673.1637551.1679974380440%40mail.yahoo.com.

[MW:34104] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi 

Client has required 4 cycle for SA266 GR4N, They requested the certificate shall included all required test at both conditions, min and max simulated PWHT Cycles,
Our forging mill has issued MTC with mechanical property, before PWHT and after PWHT But they commented " test after SPWHT performed after 4 cycles(max condition-i think after 4 times we mentioned the result as after SPWHT) and missing test after min condition"(I think there is missing test result of min SPWHT condition)

Could anyone give us idea how to solve this issue and what test result shall be added 

Can we say min and max SPWHT? We performed 4 times of SPWHT as client's request.. 

what you guys think min SPWHT condition?

Regards,
ham

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/e0257065-b095-4a75-8729-26977b86f5a8n%40googlegroups.com.

Friday, March 24, 2023

Re: [MW:34103] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

Good day friends. The marks are uniform derived from forming process. If material is fatigue prone this can prove dangerous. An Ultrasonic examination can be done on visually predominant marks to find any discontinuities. Hydro test is good. Crack propagation point of view need to be analysed for useful time.

Mohan Ananthanarayanan
Retd QA Mechanical ISRO

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 8:30 AM 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
just to add.

1. Minimum and maximum thickness to be checked and verified with Design requirement for both vessel subjected to External pressure and Internal Pressure.
2. According to ASME Sec.VIII Div.I, there is no surface roughness requirement for UCS section except for UCI & UCD.  ( Believe this is carbonm steel vessel DE made of SA105 or SA350LF2 and is paintedmcorrect me if I am wrong).
3. According to ASME Sec.IIA, there is no surface requirements for SA 105 or SA 350LF2, except for SA 182 forgings as per snap shot below.




Please consult your AI for further requirements.


Thanks & Regards

J.Gerald Jayakumar




On Thursday, 23 March, 2023 at 01:18:48 pm IST, 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:


Perform a thickness check and verify it meets design requirement and consult AI


On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 9:26, ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/1111270824.2256997.1679554751669%40mail.yahoo.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/2021745656.2316016.1679579763613%40mail.yahoo.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAA0EXw85m-uykEJmHVWwp3iWMbApM3NKAkAqBT51oWe1zqswpQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Thursday, March 23, 2023

Re: [MW:34102] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

just to add.

1. Minimum and maximum thickness to be checked and verified with Design requirement for both vessel subjected to External pressure and Internal Pressure.
2. According to ASME Sec.VIII Div.I, there is no surface roughness requirement for UCS section except for UCI & UCD.  ( Believe this is carbonm steel vessel DE made of SA105 or SA350LF2 and is paintedmcorrect me if I am wrong).
3. According to ASME Sec.IIA, there is no surface requirements for SA 105 or SA 350LF2, except for SA 182 forgings as per snap shot below.

Inline image


Please consult your AI for further requirements.


Thanks & Regards

J.Gerald Jayakumar




On Thursday, 23 March, 2023 at 01:18:48 pm IST, 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:


Perform a thickness check and verify it meets design requirement and consult AI


On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 9:26, ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com
<ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/1111270824.2256997.1679554751669%40mail.yahoo.com.

Re: [MW:34100] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

Not accept
They have been used to  wrong method to get disc shaping hammering or pressing

On 23 Mar 2023 13:18, "'james gerald' via Materials & Welding" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Perform a thickness check and verify it meets design requirement and consult AI


On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 9:26, ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/1111270824.2256997.1679554751669%40mail.yahoo.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CABjM7-u8on43AdTOWEnthRddsEK7o6%3DEtf-7d0_29UtkD9_%2BRw%40mail.gmail.com.

[MW:34101] Welding of API 5L X65 with API 5L GrB

hi expert 

could we weld API 5L GrB with API 5L X65 
We have API 5L GrB : thick 17.05
and API 5L X65 : thick 14.27

please expert i need response with reference to standard 

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/b661d541-2b3c-422c-9097-a1fcdd5b10dcn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [MW:34096] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

I think 3rd Party Who released this Vessel must be contacted to confirmed their out put. It end surface area shall be smooth. 



On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, 08:25 Vasagan Balaji, <7vasagan@gmail.com> wrote:
In 22 years of experience, Myself alone inspected more than 1k U stamped pressure vessels but never encountered as such enclosed. Strange ! Better to consult some reputed third party agencies.

On Thu, 23 Mar, 2023, 9:26 am , <ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAKV0Q%2BjRu0czN353Dv%2Btpnq62BDVZUBKhfLStLk1A6y41FzdrQ%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHqH7yDx2WnKQcwNZ49thgj6itzxnDZ6FHpj7SLTbk_eyEb3FA%40mail.gmail.com.

[MW:34096] LH690-40 vs S690QL & LH355-40 vs S355J2

Dear experts,

I would like to ask regarding these four materials if the two listed below are equivalent and able to use the same WPS.

1. LH690-40 vs S690QL
2. LH355-40 vs S355J2

Thank you.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/f64ab7b5-62cf-46be-96c1-086e3ab4ad8fn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [MW:34096] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

Perform a thickness check and verify it meets design requirement and consult AI


On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 9:26, ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com
<ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/1111270824.2256997.1679554751669%40mail.yahoo.com.

Re: [MW:34096] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

Ameer Basha,

In my entire experience of the pressure vessel manufacturing industry and being a Sr.Design Engineer as well, I never ever witnessed such a strange bulge on any head.

Seems It's straight away not ACCEPTABLE. 
However, further I am not aware about the vessel design conditions but yes if external pressure is present for this vessel then AI always ask to check and witness the head curvature with allowable maximum deviation & chord length. (Attached below reference image from my one of the project)




On top of it, even we as EPC contractors always ask vendors to submit their "Head forming procedure" to understand whether they are going to form the head by HOT or Cold way. There are few vendors who follow the COLD forming way & also it depends on thickness but never ever saw such visible bulge on it. 

Further check of Head forming also takes place in ITP e.g. If Extreme fiber elongation exceeds then, Heat treatment, PWHT involve and production test coupon, plates MTC & traceability etc.

Inspection point of view, Vendor QC Inspector, END user TPIA and ASME Inspector always have HOLD point in ITP to check and witness each stage wise activity. 

You need to dig a little more for case history and check in the inspection report and parallel with the Design Engineer to know the permissible curvature range and re-check from your end physical for your satisfaction and decision.



Regards,
Mudasar










On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 6:56 AM <ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CADVhYFgKesm7WveHKpYi0TKOkK2eMb7VKWJpSgyyhY%3DFWj5qxQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [MW:34095] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

In 22 years of experience, Myself alone inspected more than 1k U stamped pressure vessels but never encountered as such enclosed. Strange ! Better to consult some reputed third party agencies.

On Thu, 23 Mar, 2023, 9:26 am , <ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAKV0Q%2BjRu0czN353Dv%2Btpnq62BDVZUBKhfLStLk1A6y41FzdrQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [MW:34094] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

not acceptable
if they have done spinning after progressive pressing, these would disappear. it will be stress raisers in operation.

THANKS & BEST REGARDS,
KG.PANDITHAN, BE, IWE,  CSWIP 3.1,
ISO 9712 Level 2 in VT,
ASNT-Level II in PT,MT,RT & UT,
LA ISO 9001-2015,
International Welding Engineer. 
CONSULTANT-WELDING & QUALITY
Mobile no: +919940739349


On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 9:26 AM <ameerbashasheikh@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/12B831C2-EDD1-42CB-B64F-B9BAE4EAFC60%40gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJzm4eM%2BRgboUJQWhwT7%2BcgLZzEcK5Z3wDJaa1%3DrWsHdkFeYrw%40mail.gmail.com.

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

[MW:34092] Forming marks on Dish End of pressure vessel

Hi, 

One of our pressure vessel manufacturer recently supplied Oil and Gas separator having distinct forming marks on dish ends. Supplier claims that those marks are aesthetic and do not hamper vessel performance. Photo is attached herewith. 

Being the end user we are not in position to make final decision whether to accept the pressure vessel with distinct marks on dish ends and put under operation or not. The pressure vessel is designed as per ASME sec VIII Div I and vessel is U Stamped. The vessel is hydro tested and holds good. ASME inspector has not commented anything on forming marks or pressing marks in their release note. 

Please guide should we accept it or to ask supplier to rectify the same or any section of ASME code confirms non acceptance of same in pressure vessel. 

Regards, 
Ameer Basha 

image0.jpeg

image1.jpeg

Sent from my iPhone

Re: [MW:34093] Re: FILLER WIRE FOR SS 304 TO SS321

it is not 321+321 joints ( if use TIG, 321 can be used,but if we use SMAW, for same combination,  we have to use only 347.. it is a 304 +321. 

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023, 3:22 PM 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Snap shot of API RP 582 below recommends either 308 or 347 but it is for SMAW process. ER321 can be used for TIG welding and that is the idea behind the mail. New introduction.

Inline image

Inline image


Thanks & Regards

J.Gerald Jayakumar




On Wednesday, 22 March, 2023 at 10:05:41 am IST, Kannayeram Gnanapandithan <kgpandithan@gmail.com> wrote:


For Dissimilar 304 +321, what is the problem in using 308L

THANKS & BEST REGARDS,
KG.PANDITHAN, BE, IWE,  CSWIP 3.1,
ISO 9712 Level 2 in VT,
ASNT-Level II in PT,MT,RT & UT,
LA ISO 9001-2015,
International Welding Engineer. 
CONSULTANT-WELDING & QUALITY
Mobile no: +919940739349


On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:08 AM 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Suitable for TIG with  Inert Gases.


Inline image

Shielding with Inert gas prevents the Titanium from reacting.

Thanks & Regards

J.Gerald Jayakumar




On Tuesday, 21 March, 2023 at 01:06:36 pm IST, Mohd Siraj <mohd52100@gmail.com> wrote:


AWS A5.9 ER347 is best, AWS A5.9 ER321 titanium will be lost during the welding, and required property may not be achieved.

On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:47:35 PM UTC+3 abdullah Alhiji wrote:

When welding SS304 to SS321 materials, the recommended filler metal is usually an austenitic stainless steel filler metal, such as AWS A5.9 ER321 or ER347.

AWS A5.9 ER321 is a titanium-stabilized austenitic stainless steel filler metal designed for welding 321 and 347 stainless steels. It has good oxidation and corrosion resistance and can be used for welding in high-temperature applications.

AWS A5.9 ER347 is a niobium-stabilized austenitic stainless steel filler metal designed for welding 321 and 347 stainless steels. It has excellent high-temperature strength and oxidation resistance, making it suitable for welding in severe service conditions.

The selection of the filler metal will depend on the specific application and the welding process being used. It is recommended to consult the applicable code or standard and a qualified welding engineer or metallurgist for specific guidance on selecting the appropriate filler metal for your application.


On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:30 AM Student <nabe...@gmail.com> wrote:
Check AWS D1.6 for guidance 

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 12:18:43 PM UTC+3 sujit kumar wrote:
Dear experts

what will be the filler wire for SS304 TO SS321 MATERIAL






Best Regards
Sujit

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/07b11898-3655-45aa-b9d8-e07d7c64576cn%40googlegroups.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/2101559164.1700704.1679406527259%40mail.yahoo.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJzm4eP9s5-nUUk_cCFV%2BVhgDKbpTgxUqeJXoJOcwwoW396GDg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/138990610.1968863.1679478746841%40mail.yahoo.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJzm4eMdNrDfWLUge-Pxr9HAOfnit%2BU_B9oRozWX3SwyYifjuA%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [MW:34091] Re: FILLER WIRE FOR SS 304 TO SS321

I think no any problem for using 308L...

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:05 AM Kannayeram Gnanapandithan <kgpandithan@gmail.com> wrote:
For Dissimilar 304 +321, what is the problem in using 308L

THANKS & BEST REGARDS,
KG.PANDITHAN, BE, IWE,  CSWIP 3.1,
ISO 9712 Level 2 in VT,
ASNT-Level II in PT,MT,RT & UT,
LA ISO 9001-2015,
International Welding Engineer. 
CONSULTANT-WELDING & QUALITY
Mobile no: +919940739349


On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:08 AM 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Suitable for TIG with  Inert Gases.




Shielding with Inert gas prevents the Titanium from reacting.

Thanks & Regards

J.Gerald Jayakumar




On Tuesday, 21 March, 2023 at 01:06:36 pm IST, Mohd Siraj <mohd52100@gmail.com> wrote:


AWS A5.9 ER347 is best, AWS A5.9 ER321 titanium will be lost during the welding, and required property may not be achieved.

On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:47:35 PM UTC+3 abdullah Alhiji wrote:

When welding SS304 to SS321 materials, the recommended filler metal is usually an austenitic stainless steel filler metal, such as AWS A5.9 ER321 or ER347.

AWS A5.9 ER321 is a titanium-stabilized austenitic stainless steel filler metal designed for welding 321 and 347 stainless steels. It has good oxidation and corrosion resistance and can be used for welding in high-temperature applications.

AWS A5.9 ER347 is a niobium-stabilized austenitic stainless steel filler metal designed for welding 321 and 347 stainless steels. It has excellent high-temperature strength and oxidation resistance, making it suitable for welding in severe service conditions.

The selection of the filler metal will depend on the specific application and the welding process being used. It is recommended to consult the applicable code or standard and a qualified welding engineer or metallurgist for specific guidance on selecting the appropriate filler metal for your application.


On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:30 AM Student <nabe...@gmail.com> wrote:
Check AWS D1.6 for guidance 

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 12:18:43 PM UTC+3 sujit kumar wrote:
Dear experts

what will be the filler wire for SS304 TO SS321 MATERIAL






Best Regards
Sujit

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/07b11898-3655-45aa-b9d8-e07d7c64576cn%40googlegroups.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/2101559164.1700704.1679406527259%40mail.yahoo.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJzm4eP9s5-nUUk_cCFV%2BVhgDKbpTgxUqeJXoJOcwwoW396GDg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CADXbd_dcUpBhTyre_ROhpbkrKjRA%2B1YSGswF%3DCv8KxMLYe%3Dyzg%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [MW:34090] Re: FILLER WIRE FOR SS 304 TO SS321

Snap shot of API RP 582 below recommends either 308 or 347 but it is for SMAW process. ER321 can be used for TIG welding and that is the idea behind the mail. New introduction.

Inline image

Inline image


Thanks & Regards

J.Gerald Jayakumar




On Wednesday, 22 March, 2023 at 10:05:41 am IST, Kannayeram Gnanapandithan <kgpandithan@gmail.com> wrote:


For Dissimilar 304 +321, what is the problem in using 308L

THANKS & BEST REGARDS,
KG.PANDITHAN, BE, IWE,  CSWIP 3.1,
ISO 9712 Level 2 in VT,
ASNT-Level II in PT,MT,RT & UT,
LA ISO 9001-2015,
International Welding Engineer. 
CONSULTANT-WELDING & QUALITY
Mobile no: +919940739349


On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:08 AM 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Suitable for TIG with  Inert Gases.


Inline image

Shielding with Inert gas prevents the Titanium from reacting.

Thanks & Regards

J.Gerald Jayakumar




On Tuesday, 21 March, 2023 at 01:06:36 pm IST, Mohd Siraj <mohd52100@gmail.com> wrote:


AWS A5.9 ER347 is best, AWS A5.9 ER321 titanium will be lost during the welding, and required property may not be achieved.

On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:47:35 PM UTC+3 abdullah Alhiji wrote:

When welding SS304 to SS321 materials, the recommended filler metal is usually an austenitic stainless steel filler metal, such as AWS A5.9 ER321 or ER347.

AWS A5.9 ER321 is a titanium-stabilized austenitic stainless steel filler metal designed for welding 321 and 347 stainless steels. It has good oxidation and corrosion resistance and can be used for welding in high-temperature applications.

AWS A5.9 ER347 is a niobium-stabilized austenitic stainless steel filler metal designed for welding 321 and 347 stainless steels. It has excellent high-temperature strength and oxidation resistance, making it suitable for welding in severe service conditions.

The selection of the filler metal will depend on the specific application and the welding process being used. It is recommended to consult the applicable code or standard and a qualified welding engineer or metallurgist for specific guidance on selecting the appropriate filler metal for your application.


On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 7:30 AM Student <nabe...@gmail.com> wrote:
Check AWS D1.6 for guidance 

On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 12:18:43 PM UTC+3 sujit kumar wrote:
Dear experts

what will be the filler wire for SS304 TO SS321 MATERIAL






Best Regards
Sujit

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-weld...@googlegroups.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/07b11898-3655-45aa-b9d8-e07d7c64576cn%40googlegroups.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/2101559164.1700704.1679406527259%40mail.yahoo.com.

--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJzm4eP9s5-nUUk_cCFV%2BVhgDKbpTgxUqeJXoJOcwwoW396GDg%40mail.gmail.com.

[MW:35346] Cast-iron welding

Any advice for cast iron welding Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone