Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from July, 2017

[MW:26692] Slope tolerance on piping

Dears,   Could you advise with code ref or guidlines. Construction codes: ASME B31.1 & I sections. What's the tolerance for piping slope ? Regards. -- Thanks and Regards,  ----- زكرياء غراب GHRAB Zakaria   -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

Re: [MW:26691] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Can you give code reference for the formula ? Never seen it in ASME Sec VIII Div.1 or 2. PREM S NAUTIYAL CELL : 9769316004 From: "\'raouf salhi\' via Materials & Welding" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> Sent: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:32:36 To: "materials-welding@googlegroups.com" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [MW:26690] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation   Dears ∆ P=  ρ .g. ∆ H     ρ = test fluid density ( 1000 kg / m3 for water ) g = gravity ( 9.8 )   regards   SALHI Raouf QA/QC Engineer   Tel: Morocco +212628979891       Tunisia +21621458258   Le Jeudi 27 juillet 2017 4h39, ks sakhileshmon <kssakhilesh@gmail.com> a écrit :   Dear sir,   Can I know the details of " ρ" in this equation    ∆ P=  ρ .g. ∆ H   On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:12 PM, 'rao...

Re: [MW:26690] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Dears ∆ P=  ρ .g. ∆ H   ρ = test fluid density ( 1000 kg / m3 for water ) g = gravity ( 9.8 ) regards   SALHI Raouf QA/QC Engineer Tel: Morocco +212628979891       Tunisia +21621458258 Le Jeudi 27 juillet 2017 4h39, ks sakhileshmon <kssakhilesh@gmail.com> a écrit : Dear sir, Can I know the details of " ρ" in this equation    ∆ P=  ρ .g. ∆ H On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:12 PM, 'raouf salhi' via Materials & Welding < materials-welding@googlegroups.com > wrote: Dear chandra , To calculate pressure difference between two points with difefrent level we have this formula : ∆ P= ρ .g. ∆ H Le Mercredi 26 juillet 2017 14h15, Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra < bapunchandra@gmail.com > a écrit : Dear Experts                       Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation ...

Re: [MW:26689] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Dear sir, Can I know the details of " ρ" in this equation    ∆ P=  ρ .g. ∆ H On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:12 PM, 'raouf salhi' via Materials & Welding < materials-welding@googlegroups.com > wrote: Dear chandra , To calculate pressure difference between two points with difefrent level we have this formula : ∆ P= ρ .g. ∆ H Le Mercredi 26 juillet 2017 14h15, Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra < bapunchandra@gmail.com > a écrit : Dear Experts                       Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height ) -- tHanks & rEgards Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra -- https://materials-welding. blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, se...

Re: [MW:26688] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Dear chandra , To calculate pressure difference between two points with difefrent level we have this formula : ∆ P= ρ .g. ∆ H Le Mercredi 26 juillet 2017 14h15, Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra <bapunchandra@gmail.com> a écrit : Dear Experts                       Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height ) -- tHanks & rEgards Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.googl...

[MW:26687] Hydrotest Pressure difference in Higher points caluclation

Dear Experts                       Anybody kindly provide any guidelines or formulas for pressure loss calculation during hydrotest against the elevation (from 0 elevation to any height ) -- tHanks & rEgards Chandra Bhanu Mohapatra -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

RE: [MW:26686] 7018

The M designator is a "Mandatory Classification Designator" that indicates that the electrode meets the US military requirements (MIL Spec.)– see ASME Section II Part C, SFA-5.1 figure 10.  These are more stringent than typical commercial requirements.  The Level 1 indicates the testing level within the applicable MIL Spec. See the following.   Hope this helps/answers your question.   From SFA 5.1 Annex A:   A7.6.8 E7018M [E4918M] Classification   A7.6.8.1 E7018M [E4918M] electrodes are similar to E7018-1H4R [E4918-1H4R] electrodes, except that the testing for mechanical properties and for classification is done on a groove weld that has a 60° included angle and, for electrodes up to 5/32 in [4.0 mm], welded in the vertical position with upward progression. The impact test results are evaluated using all five test values and higher values are required at –20°F [–30°C]. The maximum allowable moisture in-coating values in the "as-recei...

Re: [MW:26685] Nickel Less Than 1%

Please refer below about your query.  Well Explain by Mr. Goswami   Nickel in C-Mn steel increases the acicular ferrite. Usually ferrite in C-Mn steel, which is usually soft is polygonal ferrite. Increase of acicular ferrite causes increase of UTS, impact strength and at the same time hardness also. The last one(hardness control) is  the topmost priority in Sour Service.   Theoretical studies and practical work has established that 1% Ni in weld metal is the optimum to get the desired requirements of sour service. Acceptance  of Ni beyond 1% is still debatable and subject to many studies.   Please see the attachments for your reference and information.   Thanks.     Pradip Goswami, P.Eng,IWE Welding & Metallurgical Specialist Ontario, Canada pgoswami@quickclic.net pgoswami@sympatico.ca On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:34 PM, 'Shashank Vagal' via Materials & Welding < materials-welding@googlegroups.com > wrote: Hello dear, May be you will find it explained more extensive...

Re: [MW:26684] Magnetic particle testing of fillet joints - Yoke or Prod?

Dear Sir,  Good Morning , i Have Agree with your commends , I like to know that when you doing vertical Weld Joint at Dry method , we can able to use same yoke method  if we have any problem , let me know what kind of problem we will face on it  Material : S235J2 (Zinc Coated ) Best Regards Sankar.k Welding Inspector  Enka  On Thursday, November 3, 2011 at 12:42:00 AM UTC+3, hpi001 wrote: You only can use the prod method when putting the electrodes on the weld surface because of the magnetic field lines, in my opinion a Yoke will be the best method. Beside that when you don't have proper contact with the probes there is a risk of arcs which can cause copper penetration in the surface of your material.   Met vriendelijke groeten / Best Regards   Herman Pieper   Pieper Quality Support & Inspection Phone: +31 (0)521 380083 Fax:     +31 (0)84 7539225 Cell:     +31 (0)6 51691215 www.pieper-qsi.nl   Van: material...@ googlegroups.com [mailto: material...@ googlegroups.com ] Namens ...

Re: [MW:26683] Nickel Less Than 1%

Hello dear, May be you will find it explained more extensively in this article: https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/corrrev.2014.32.issue-3-4/corrrev-2014-0027/corrrev-2014-0027.pdf   Best Regards, Shashank C Vagal   (Quality Adviser), (+91) 8082395502, 8779046302, 74000330711 Neo Metal-Analyst & NDT Services  ( Approved by IBR, Thermax, AERB) Regd Office : 301, PRATHAMESH, M G Rd – Mahant Rd, Vile Parle East, Mumbai 400 057 INDIA Tel: +91 22 2611 6640 / (+91) 9821386292 / 9819191861     Works Office : A-25, Geet Siddhee, Sector No. 11, Pradhikaran, Gat No. 62, Boradewasti, Moshi, Dist: Haveli, PCMC, Pune – 411044, Maharashtra, India      www.neometalanalystndt.com  /  enquiry@neometalanalystndt.com  /  nach_sam@yahoo.com On Saturday, 22 July 2017 10:44 AM, sn vl <weldinspn@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Experts, In NACE MR0175 Why Ni was restricted less than 1% in Carb...

[MW:26679] identification and tractability

why identification and tractability is mandatory for LTCS and NACEpiping materials ? -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

[MW:26679] Nickel Less Than 1%

Dear Experts, In NACE MR0175 Why Ni was restricted less than 1% in Carbon and Low alloy Steels. Please Clarify . Regards SNVL. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .

[MW:26679] 7018

Hello, What is the difference between 7018 and 7018m?  Also, I see on ebay rods that are 7018m have a designation of level 1 - what is the level 1? Thanks. -- https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com . Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/materials-welding . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout .