Skip to main content

Re: [MW:36098] Request for Technical Opinion – Leakage in SS 316L Schedule 10S Line After 4 Months of Service

 Dear Mr. Sharafudden,
You have not mentioned the type of material used, its thickness, application, Standards followed and other details. 
In our view, repair should comply with internationally accepted practices such as ASME B31.3 (Process Piping).
Cut out the defective portion and replace it with a new pipe. Inserting a new pipe within the existing pipe and
fillet welding is not a good idea, as it may create stress concentration. Also, cannot be accepted as a permanent 
repair process under the code. Hence,
  • a.   Identify and mark the defective areas by VT, and UT (if possible) for pipe thickness measurement.
  • b.  If pitting extends beyond the visible leak, extend the cut until only unaffected material remains.
    c.  Fabricate a new replacement section after PMI, and use a suitable welding process.
    d.  Prepare a repair WPS, and make sure that the weld meets the WPS norms and the welder is qualified. If it is SS, 
         maintain  the interpass temp. and strictly control the heat input. Perform100% VT and RT.
    e.  Have a check on the hydor-test water for its chemistry, Chloride, Sulphur, iron content, and pH factor before using it.
    f.  Post hydro test, drain all the standing water fully with dry (oil free) compressed air.
    g. Complete the weld map, weld records including, base and filler materials. batch certificates, fit up, weld and NDT 
        report, pressure test etc. 
    h. Make sure that everything is in order.
    Trust above info. will be of help to you to make a start to repair the defects and overcome the issues.

    C Sridhar.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 at 10:07, Muhammed Sharafudeen.C.H. <sharafu.nooru@gmail.com> wrote:
    Dear all,

    Kindly advise on the appropriate repair method for the corroded pipe spools.
    Specifically, please confirm whether the following repair options are acceptable:
    Can the corroded bottom portion of the pipe spool be cut out and replaced with a new section of the same material, using the approved WPS and qualified welding procedure?
    Alternatively, is it acceptable to insert a pipe of the same diameter inside the corroded section and perform internal fillet welds as a repair method?
    As I am not a welding specialist, I would appreciate your technical guidance on the most suitable repair approach. Please also provide a detailed repair procedure, including inspection and testing requirements, so that the repaired spool can be accepted and handed over to the client.
    Since this project is located at a major airport, the repair method must comply with the international procedures, and relevant codes and standards.

    Warm Regards...

    Mohamed Sharafudeen C.H


    On Sun, Jun 28, 2026, 6:31 AM Marco Nunes <marcovsky82@gmail.com> wrote:
    I agree with the MIC process as the main failure mechanism. 

    M Nunes
    Senior Materials Engineer 


    On Sat, 27 Jun 2026, 3:19 am Karuppa Samy, <samyqc08@gmail.com> wrote:

    Dear Sridhar,

    Thank you for your kind response and valuable inputs on this matter. We are currently analyzing the root cause of the issue, and your insights will be highly beneficial to our efforts. We truly appreciate the time you have taken to share your thoughts with us.

    Thank you once again for your support.

    Regards,

    K. Karuppasamy


    On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 9:39 PM sridhar cn <sridharcn305@gmail.com> wrote:
    Dear Mr. Karuppasamy.
    Please refer to the issues you have faced in your SS 316L pipes both on the weld joints and base pipe.
    Since the media is 'utility water', and the leakage occurred after 4 months in service, the probable 
    causes could be:
    1.  Hydro test / Utility water:
    a.  Stagnant hydrotest water / poor preservation, Utility water is often left idle for periods during commissioning. 
    b.  If hydrotest water was not completely drained and dried, dissolved oxygen promotes localized corrosion or
         water evaporation concentrates Chlorides.
    c.  Pitting initiates beneath deposits or in crevices. Thin schedule 10S pipe can be perforated relatively quickly. 

        This mechanism can affect both welds and parent metal.

    2. Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC):
    a.  Utility water is particularly susceptible to MIC if the system remains stagnant.   
    b.  The pre-water treatment was not started promptly.
    c.  MIC often produces small pinholes and deep pits leading to localised leaks.

    c.  A leak after only a few months is entirely consistent with aggressive MIC under its own favorable conditions.

    3. Pitting Corrosion due to Chlorides:

    a.  Although 316L has good corrosion resistance, it is not immune to high chloride content in utility water.
    b.  Deposits on the internal surface and Crevices create oxygen concentration cells.
    d.  Since the pipe is thin, even localized pitting can penetrate the pipe within months.
    4. Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking:
    a. SCC usually requires, Tensile stress and Chlorides, 
    b. If your utility water operates near ambient temperature, SCC becomes less likely.
       If chloride levels are high and residual welding stresses are significant  SCC becomes more likely.

    Please check the source of the utility water. Is it a bore, river or treated water? Also check the chloride 
    concentration (ppm) in the water used. Was the line completely drained and fully air-blown? These are 
    some of the important steps to be considered prior to and after the hydro test.
    5. Suggestions:
    Please remove one leaking pipe section, including the weld and perform visual examination / PT of both 
    internal and external surfaces.
    Perform metallographic examination of the leak (weld & pipe) areas.
    Further analyze the utility water for Chlorides, dissolved Oxygen, pH factor, and sulphates.
    If possible, inspect the internal surface using a borescope to determine whether damage is widespread or localized.

    In a nutshell, the reasons could be due to: 
    1. Improper post-hydrotest preservation leading to localized corrosion,
    2. Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC),
    3. Pitting corrosion due to chlorides in utility water,     (or)
    4. Localized corrosion in the crevices or Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking.

    Hope the above info. will help you to analyse and take suitable remedial action.
    C Sridhar.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 17:24, Muhammed Sharafudeen.C.H. <sharafu.nooru@gmail.com> wrote:
    Dear all,
    We have similar case in our project where the stagnant water cause 316l fire water utility lines spools inside valve chamber due to MIC. Anyone suggestions how to repair this?
    Since these are corroded at bottom portion of SS316l 6" , 12" and 24" buried lines. 
    Much appreciated .

    Warm Regards...

    Mohamed Sharafudeen C.H


    On Fri, Jun 26, 2026, 1:52 PM Karuppa Samy <samyqc08@gmail.com> wrote:

    Dear Jenish Mistry,



    Utility water service

    On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 2:04 PM Jenish Mistry <jenishmistry1992@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi Krupa ,

    Can you share further information regarding which service, the line had been in use for 4 month period ?

    On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 1:13 PM Karuppa Samy <samyqc08@gmail.com> wrote:

    Dear All,

    We would appreciate your technical opinion regarding a leakage issue observed in stainless steel piping after several months of operation.

    Background:

    • Line sizes: 2" and 6" 361L Stainless Steel (Schedule 10S)
    • NDT coverage: 10% completed as per project requirements
    • Hydrostatic test: Successfully passed without any leakage
    • Records related to line preservation after reinstatement are not available, as the system was under the control of the Pre-Commissioning and Commissioning teams
    • The line has been in service for approximately 4 months

    Issue:
    Leakage has recently been observed at several locations, including:

    1. Weld joints
    2. Pipe body/base material
      Considering that the line successfully passed hydrotesting and has been operating for several months before the leakage occurred ,  

     Could you please share your views on the potential reasons

    Thank you in advance for your valuable inputs.

    Best Regards,
    Karuppasamy

    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJg1Szkrj653Rm7mW0GT2rjsedFdY2wSXxXr5uKQHAAgMxeTMg%40mail.gmail.com.

    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CADXbd_etU7mwTYxRMnmjAAwYd9e32f7uu83EqMjuJy0KMidiHw%40mail.gmail.com.


    --
    K. Karuppasamy


    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJg1SzkU2k6HeagA7A%3D%3Dwb90C679Vx3sEJUBOtqCcg9YSZcY%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.

    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAGq0KQM6snJmM9sH2ufX9-%3D0_ZRsqFjsiKQVL_%3DU9EoBJoO9Uw%40mail.gmail.com.

    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHo%3DYihrOJGSp2J3EmJ%3DB5BgCbU5OcrCPCFyxYHDKDGFPBTSeA%40mail.gmail.com.


    --
    K. Karuppasamy


    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAJg1Szn%2Bkxo25yENVb-xq4sOVsr2-%2BTQ8yAWUBTBz5gf%3Dkg5fA%40mail.gmail.com.

    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHXTn11F5Ti02M80Ha4gyiMUJaUTVZxMEtGrnFgjHRL%3DYJTLQA%40mail.gmail.com.

    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAGq0KQNRi1i-Rk36LyQxVMtmen81_WWHuSujQwn1pCRBLxZTOw%40mail.gmail.com.

    --
    https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
    https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/CAHo%3DYijRz9iAX4XSgZqPaF_TSN1yqLjuERqxFRruzTeZNBuyGA%40mail.gmail.com.

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

    Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

    Materails FAQs

    Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

    Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

    Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...