Just to add.
From the below it is self explanatory.
You can understand about the reheat coil below and many Pipes are produced from the Reheat Slab depending on the type of forming and heat treatment as below.
Thanks & Regards
J.Gerald Jayakumar
On Monday, 4 September, 2023 at 10:59:54 am IST, 'james gerald' via Materials & Welding <materials-welding@googlegroups.com> wrote:
According to my Interpretation,
1. Mother Coil is the initial Billet/Slab obtained from one Heat of the Furnace.
2. If 2 Heat Niumber (or 2 different rejeated slabs confirmed with Pipe Mill) exists the word should may be considered as shall else same Heat shall be used for testing.
Thanks & Regards
J.Gerald Jayakumar
On Monday, 4 September, 2023 at 08:41:14 am IST, Pravin Mohite <praveenss224@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Experts,
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/efe3d39d-6dcf-4b6b-8d6c-dac9c6ab4067n%40googlegroups.com.
Need your advise on the interpretation of statement referred in Cl - 10.2.12.2 (b) of API 5L 46th edition for tensile retest of Gr. X65M SAWL line pipe.
The statement of this clause which I am looking for your advise is - 'the retest specimen should be taken from two different mother coils or plate, as applicable'
Below are the queries on this statement :
1. For the word 'should' referred in this statement. Since as per API 5L terms, 'should' refers to recommended practice & does not make it mandatory to manufacturer to comply.
2. The term referred as 'mother Coils or plate'. Since specification doesn't referring the term as 'Mother Coils or Mother Plate' , I can consider the other daughter plates from mother plates to take retest samples.
My interpretation on the statement is -
'It is not mandatory for the manufacturer to take the retest sample from the two different mother plates. He can take retest samples from the other daughter plates of same mother plates from which initial tensile test specimen was taken '.
Requesting experts to advise on the interpretation of above statement and opinion about my interpretation.
With regards,
Pravin Mohite
+91 9664 232573
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/efe3d39d-6dcf-4b6b-8d6c-dac9c6ab4067n%40googlegroups.com.
--
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/582973989.2413010.1693805127945%40mail.yahoo.com.
https://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/122787
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/582973989.2413010.1693805127945%40mail.yahoo.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment