Materials & Welding

Any issues with welder vs welding operator qualification? I'm less familiar with D1.1 vs ASME. On Jun 25, 9:34 am, "Armstrong, Joel" < JoelArmstr...@letu.edu > wrote: > Yes, we've done the same thing here with the approval of ABS and no need to requalify. > > ________________________________ > > From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com on behalf of ikaria73 > Sent: Thu 6/25/2009 8:27 AM > To: Materials & Welding > Subject: [MW:2550] D1.1 - WPS - Semi-Auto vs Auto - Need new PQR/WPS > > Hello, > Is a new PQR required if the process is changed from semi-automatic to > automatic?  I am welding piles and would like to use a BUG-O system > with FCAW-GS and already have a PQR/WPS with FCAW-GS semi-automatic. > Can I use the existing PQR to create a new WPS as long as I stay > within the procedures? > > Regards > >  winmail.dat > 5KViewDownload --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~-...

Dear All As per API 650 the telltale hole for a reinforcement pad should be kept in horizontal position or axis ,can anybody explain why? Thank you in advance -- Navin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

however change +/- 20% oscillation variables needs new PQR, when CVN impact required On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Armstrong, Joel < JoelArmstrong@letu.edu > wrote: Yes, we've done the same thing here with the approval of ABS and no need to requalify. ________________________________ From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com on behalf of ikaria73 Sent: Thu 6/25/2009 8:27 AM To: Materials & Welding Subject: [MW:2550] D1.1 - WPS - Semi-Auto vs Auto - Need new PQR/WPS Hello, Is a new PQR required if the process is changed from semi-automatic to automatic?  I am welding piles and would like to use a BUG-O system with FCAW-GS and already have a PQR/WPS with FCAW-GS semi-automatic. Can I use the existing PQR to create a new WPS as long as I stay within the procedures? Regards --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email ...

Yes, we've done the same thing here with the approval of ABS and no need to requalify. ________________________________ From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com on behalf of ikaria73 Sent: Thu 6/25/2009 8:27 AM To: Materials & Welding Subject: [MW:2550] D1.1 - WPS - Semi-Auto vs Auto - Need new PQR/WPS Hello, Is a new PQR required if the process is changed from semi-automatic to automatic? I am welding piles and would like to use a BUG-O system with FCAW-GS and already have a PQR/WPS with FCAW-GS semi-automatic. Can I use the existing PQR to create a new WPS as long as I stay within the procedures? Regards --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel view...

  Jara Dyaan Dijeye !! Boss: Arz kiya hai.. Kaam hote hain Galtiyo ka sama hota hai Aise mausam mein he to PERFORMANCE jawan hota hai Dil ki khunnas BOSS jabaan se nahi kehte Ye fasana to appraisal mein bayan hota hai Employee's reply... Arz kiya hai   Appraisal hote hain Disappointment ka sama hota hai Aise mausam mein hi to ATTRITION jawan hota hai Dil ki khunnas HUM jabaan se nahi kehte Ye fasana to resignation se bayan hota hai.    

Hello, Is a new PQR required if the process is changed from semi-automatic to automatic? I am welding piles and would like to use a BUG-O system with FCAW-GS and already have a PQR/WPS with FCAW-GS semi-automatic. Can I use the existing PQR to create a new WPS as long as I stay within the procedures? Regards --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/ The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

if it is a closed vessel, you may opt for pneumatic test with approval of designer/client, also take care of hazards involved in this test. On Jun 25, 4:15 pm, harish katesia < harish.kate...@gmail.com > wrote: > Dear sir, > > I am talking for the product of hydro-power plant area, The component has > got bowl kind of shape.The size of the component is 6 meter diameter & 4 > meter in height. > > The design has asked to check with 100% U.T. & in addition to this, needs to > be check for water tightness. > > So for such a big size component, filling of water is not feasible, so does > ASME codes has any provision to check for water tightness except to fill > with water > > Hydro test also can not be done. > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Raghuram Bathula < raghurambath...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > fill with water, if it doesn't leak its water tight!! ASME has > > require...