Skip to main content

[MW:14476] RE: 14470] RE: 14469] RE: 14466] Re: Material equivalent

By Materials & Welding
Dear Mr.John A.Henning.,

Thanks for your immediate respond with the required advice.
I hope I would be of any assistance in future for our Group.
Please accept my sincere respect and regards

Best rgrds
D.eng.A.Aziz Gendia
ecco-spi President & CEO
Mob.: +2012 21 33 956
Fax: +202 2477 8411
e-mail: ecco-spi@gmail.com



-----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
[mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Henning
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:41 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:14470] RE: 14469] RE: 14466] Re: Material equivalent

This would appear to be similar to EN 1.4315 or similar to AISI 304LN but
with higher carbon content. The only hits specifically for X5CrNiN 18 10
were several material certifications from a Russian manufacturer with
chemistries similar to 304 with regard to Cr and Ni content.

By the way:

Uddeholm is a German company
X5 CrNiN 18 10 appears to be standard EN type notation indicating 0.05
carbon 18Cr 10Ni with the addition of nitrogen
UNI 7500-75 is UNI stand specification 7500, steels for pressure
vessels, 1975 edition (ref. Key to Metals)

Designation would not support 310, Cr and Ni too high, or 312, Cr too high,
for your designation. Good luck.

John A. Henning
Welding & Materials

-----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
[mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of eccospi
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 6:44 AM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:14469] RE: 14466] Re: Material equivalent

Dear Experts.,

Thanks for your respond but as stated on plates Stamp NYBY UDDEHOLM NU
STAINLESS N3MM X5CR.NI N18 10 UNI 7500/75

I believe it will be SA240 = ST ST 310s or 312

I hope this data will be sufficient for technical decision.
Best regards to you all


Best rgrds
D.eng.A.Aziz Gendia
ecco-spi President & CEO
Mob.: +2012 21 33 956
Fax: +202 2477 8411
e-mail: ecco-spi@gmail.com



-----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
[mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of dwimukh
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 2:59 PM
To: Materials & Welding
Subject: [MW:14466] Re: Material equivalent

Try to get chemical composition for UNI 7500-75 grade, As per my knowledge
Suffix is missing like A,B,G etc

On Jun 1, 2:49 pm, "eccospi" <ecco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All.,
>
> Kindly need the equivalent  of STEEL PLATE Specs  UNI 7500/75  to ASME
STD.
>
> Thanks in advance for your assistance.
>
> Best rgrds
>
> D.eng.A.Aziz Gendia
>
> ecco-spi President & CEO
>
> Mob.: +2012 21 33 956
>
> Fax: +202 2477 8411
>
> e-mail: ecco-...@gmail.com

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and
meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions
w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and
meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions
w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

______________________________________________________________________
The information in this email is confidential, and is intended solely for
the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this email please
let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. The internet can not
guarantee the integrity of this message. HAMON (and its subsidiaries) shall
(will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
______________________________________________________________________

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and
meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions
w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

By Materials & Welding
Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...
Post a Comment
Read more

Materails FAQs

By Materials & Welding
Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...
21 comments
Read more

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

By Materials & Welding
Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...
Post a Comment
Read more