Monday, September 12, 2011

[MW:12440] Re: Difference between SB625 UNS NO8904 & SA 240 Type 904L

what is your design code? in case of ASME BPV, SA240 N08904 is
neither listed (e.g refer UNF table 23) nor allowable stresses are
given in Part II D. if you want to use SA240 N08904, what is the basis
for allowable stresses of this material?
though its strange, also for welding, In Sec IX as far as SA240 N08904
is concerned, it is an unlisted material.

On Aug 20, 9:38 pm, meisam shokri arfaei <meisamsho...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Kapli,
> As far I know,the UNS No. is unique for each material, it means that if one
> material introduced with one UNS No. and this material mentioned in two or
> more standards, they are the same.
>
> Regards
>
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM, kapil bhamburdekar <
>
> kapilbhamburde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
>
> > Thanks for your reply but i want to let you know that we have recieved
> > plate of SA 240 Type 904L, but as per our drawing it is to be SB625
> > UNS NO8904, so my question is after check testing of 904L plate is it
> > possible to recertify it to SB625 UNS NO8904 plate.
>
> > Assuming,All dimensional tolerances are satisfacory for 904L plate as
> > per SB625 UNS NO8904.
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Kapil
>
> > On Aug 19, 2:38 pm, meisam shokri arfaei <meisamsho...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Dear Kapil,
> > > The uns N08904 is introdused in those two standards are the same (SA240
> > > TP904L and SB625 UNS N08904), but just in chemical and mechanical
> > > properties. There is too much restrictions in SB625 other than chemical
> > and
> > > mechanical properties. If had a look on SB625 and it had some
> > requirements
> > > for dimennsional and tolerances of products which theu are not mentioned
> > in
> > > SA240.
>
> > > Regards
> > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:14 AM, kapil bhamburdekar <
>
> > > kapilbhamburde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Dear All Experts,
>
> > > > I want to know about the Difference between ASME SB625 UNS NO8904 &
> > ASME SA
> > > > 240 Type 904L,
>
> > > > I have checked chemical and physical properties which are same for
> > both,
> > > > but still Inspector is demanding for SB 625 Plate instead of ASME SA
> > 240
> > > > Type 304 plate.
>
> > > > Regards,
>
> > > > Kapil Bhamburdekar
> > > > QA Engineer
>

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

Re: [MW:34913] Filler wire

E71T-1C  is Charpy Impact tested at -20degC E71T-1CJ is Charpy impact tested at -40degC. AWS Classification for FCAW is only a supplementary...