Why do you get more benefit out of that?
You may refer ASME SEC V, Article 23 - Ultrasonic standards you get
DGS usage and Appendix X3 also mentioning about usage
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:06:45 +0530 wrote
>Dear All,
Can anyone give reason why DGS method for sensitivity and sizing of
defects in UT is not being mentioned in ASME Sec. V where as several of
Europe / Russian and Nuclear codes follow the same. As per ASME, DAC is
being used for the above purpose.
Can we approach ASME for the same.
Regards,
Raghavendra
Larsen & Toubro Limited
www.larsentoubro.com
This Email may contain confidential or privileged information for the
intended recipient (s) If you are not the intended recipient, please do
not use or disseminate the information, notify the sender and delete it
from your system.
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-
welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-
welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views
and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own
decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
Dear Sir,
Thanking You,
Honesty is the best Policy
With Warm Regards,
Muthu Barathi P
Mobile No:00962788269821 (Jordan)
00962775401951
 |
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment