Skip to main content

RE: [MW:9326] Higher value of UTS, acceptable?


Dear JJ,

I would like to draw your attention to clause 11.1 of SA-350 which states:

"If the results of the mechanical tests do not conform to the requirements specified, the manufacturer may reheat treat the forgings represented, and shall retest to the applicable requirements."

You can seek clarification from supplier for not meeting the tensile range and how he has certified the material?

Regards,

Santosh Latake




<jignesh.rana@Linde-LE.com>
Sent by: materials-welding@googlegroups.com

01/19/2011 09:52 AM

Please respond to
materials-welding@googlegroups.com

To
<materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
cc
Subject
RE: [MW:9324] Higher value of UTS, acceptable?






Dear JJ,


I fully agree with Mr. Goswami's feedback. No point in getting drag based on one property only. However,  I suggest following steps in order to take final call.  



1.0 Carry out PMI examination in order to confirm Material as per A 350 LF2.
2.0 Carry out thorough hardness survey and conclude approximate UTS. . (Reference  A 370 ,Table 2). If your hardness results ( viz a viz tensile strength values) are in the accepted range of A 350 LF2,
      then ask for additional test coupon from forging supplier. If feasible and possible, take coupon ( may be one piece from entire lot) and carry out physical testing.
3.0 To get rid of typographic error, call for physical testing results.  ( test being carried out at forging supplier's end / external laboratory )


With Best Regards,

Jignesh R Rana
Manager - QA & QC

Linde Engineering India Pvt. Ltd.
38, Nutan Bharat Society, Alkapuri, Vadodara 390007, India
Tel.: +91 265 3056789, Fax: +91 265 2335213 , Mobil:  +91 90999 86019
jignesh.rana@linde-le.com, www.linde-india.com

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. You should not disclose its contents to any other person nor use it for any purposes.




"pgoswami" <pgoswami@quickclic.net>
Sent by: materials-welding@googlegroups.com

19/01/11 10:26

Please respond to
materials-welding@googlegroups.com

To
<materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
cc
Subject
RE: [MW:9320] Higher value of UTS, acceptable?







Dear JJ,

 

I would think , you need to see if all the requirements of SA 350LF2, Cl1 are being met or not. Getting dragged on to only one property may not be right. If all other properties are within the specification requirements , it may be worthwhile to seek an explanation from the mill/supplier.

 

Errors in test results could be due to many things.

 

Thanks.

 

Pradip Goswami,P.Eng.

Welding & Metallurgical Specialist & Consultant

Email-pgoswami@
sympatico.ca,
pgoswami@quickclic.net
 


From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kathalingam Babu
Sent:
Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:09 PM
To:
materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject:
Re: [MW:9319] Higher value of UTS, acceptable?

Hi
 
Since spec. clearly indicates the range, it has be to within the range, otherwise not acceptable
 
Thanks & Regards,
 
K. Babu

----- Original Message -----

From:
joshi jaydeep
To:
materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Sent:
Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:47 AM

Subject:
[MW:9317] Higher value of UTS, acceptable?


Dear all,
 

I have a material
A350 LF2, CL1  with UTS of 724MPa (As mentioned in TC of Manufacturer).
 

As per ASME Sec IIA, requirement is
485 - 655 Mpa.
 

The higher value of UTS beyond the spec requirements is aceptable?

 

Thanks.

Regards,

JJ

--
To post to this group, send email to
materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at
http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...