Sunday, November 28, 2010

Re: [MW:8414] Defect in PQR Specimen

This test is condemned, you have to rerun the PQR

--- On Sat, 27/11/10, yoga nandhan <yoganandhan@gmail.com> wrote:

From: yoga nandhan <yoganandhan@gmail.com>
Subject: [MW:8399] Defect in PQR Specimen
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Date: Saturday, 27 November, 2010, 12:30 PM

Anyone, Can u plz give your opinion,
 
PQR qualification of SS pipe, 30" x 15.88 mm thik pipe by SMAW+SAW process, In RT defect observed in 200 mm length which is not acceptable as per Sec IX. But rest of the portions are without any significant defects.
 
Can we proceed with the Mechanical testing after discarding the defect area or is it required to Repair & Re-RT to be done in the defect area before taking the specimen for mechancial testing.....  Plz clarify.
 
BR
P.Yoganandhan

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

Re: [MW:34913] Filler wire

E71T-1C  is Charpy Impact tested at -20degC E71T-1CJ is Charpy impact tested at -40degC. AWS Classification for FCAW is only a supplementary...