Hi Pat,
Here're some snapshots of both the materials, from SA -213.
Mechanical property wise there should not be any major issues.Both materials would meet 6000 psi constraints. May be it would be a good idea by the designer to check the allowable stress values in ASME Sec-II,Part-D,and approve the substitution.
If there're service induced corrosion issues especially intergranular corrosion testing as per ASTM-A-262, then a change of grade should be validated with new PQR on the material of same grade.
Thanks.
Pradip Goswami,P.Eng.,IWE
Welding & Metallurgical Specialist & Consultant
Email-pgoswami@sympatico.ca,
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Brennan
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:51 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:8152] 1" Sch 160 304 Stainless Steel Heavy Wall Pipe and 304L.
Importance: High
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 2:51 PM
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:8152] 1" Sch 160 304 Stainless Steel Heavy Wall Pipe and 304L.
Importance: High
We are doing a project a project with 1” Sch1 60. The vendor ordered 304 not 304L, will the 304 meet the 6000PSI operating constraints?
Please advise.
Sincerely;
Patrick Brennan
CFM / VR-TESCO LLC
CONTINENTAL FIELD MACHINING
1875 Fox Lane
Elgin, IL, 60123
800.323.1393 Office
847.895.7006 Fax
847.894.3355 Cell
847.628.8026 Direct
"
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment