Hi Mayank,
The design environment operating conditions are way too much of austenitic stainless steel. That's why Alloy 80 selected. If you could forward some more information on the operating environment, the extent of cyclic services (all round the year or only a temporary phenomenon), design conditions of the equipments etc, more relevant answers to your query could be found.
Thanks
Pradip Goswami,P.Eng.
Welding & Metallurgical Specialist & Consultant
Email-pgoswami@sympatico.ca,
pgoswami@quickclic.net
-----Original Message-----
From: materials-welding@googlegroups.com [mailto:materials-welding@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mayank .
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:00 AM
To: materials-welding
Subject: [MW:7585] Cyclic Thermal Loading material Selection 800H / 316H /304H -Regarding
Dear
We have situation where in - - due to process conditions the equipment has cyclic loading more or less of the below cycle
H2 @ 700 Deg C - two- three days - N2 @710DegC - two-three days -
Co2+N2@ 200DegC one day .
Proposal was to use 800H material initially (reason for Selection of Material not known ) in the last stage , we came to know that existing plant has one 304H which is working fine .
I referred NACE for guidance - it indicates 316 as good material for H2S materials in high temperatures but couldnt find the N2 & Co2 +N2 part . Some say 316 stabilised ...
ASM Metals hand book (quite scared me ...coz few case studies have failures within Days if not in Weeks & Months ) referred API 941 . (I dont have a copy , does this Standard have any recommendation of material for the above??? )
-recommendations go on...........
anybody has experience of the same / somewhat close cycles in their Process Plant? -
Any path forward will help a lot ...
---------------------
HAPPY DUSSERA !
Regards
--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
No comments:
Post a Comment