Thursday, July 1, 2010

Re: [MW:5810] MPI vs DPI

Hi,
Normal Detection depth in MT shall be 6mm.However maximum detection depth shall be 15mm Very large cracks can be found in normal practice.
But as per magnaflux(MT equipment manufacturer) recommendation Normal detection depth - 6mm.However 12mm to 25mm can be acheived.
 
Thanks & Regards,
 
(Karthik)

Karthikeyan.S
 
Getabec Energy Co.,Ltd.
379,Moo6,Soi8,Nikhomphatana,
Rayong-21180,
Thailand.
Phone: 0066 38 897035-8 (Off)
Fax: 0066 38 897034
Hand Phone: 0066 892512282


--- On Wed, 6/30/10, mahendran p <pmahe_79@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

From: mahendran p <pmahe_79@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: [MW:5807] MPI vs DPI
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010, 8:35 PM

Hi all,
         I have to clarify regarding the MPI that can detect sub-surface. I can't see any code or std mention abt how much depth(6mm) can it detect the defects. Please inform me which std mention may i refer?
 
Thanks & regards,
P.Mahendran

--- On Wed, 30/6/10, manoj john <manojacgnr@gmail.com> wrote:

From: manoj john <manojacgnr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MW:5796] MPI vs DPI
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 30 June, 2010, 8:48 AM

Mpi  can be used only on ferromagnetic materials.  It can detect subsurface defects.
 
DPI can be used on any material.  It can detect only the defects which are open to the surface.

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:35 PM, mohammed helal <eng_hilal79@yahoo.com> wrote:
The major difference  is the DPI is only for the defects that open to the surface and the MPI  for the subsurface defect ( 6 mm deep).

Eng.MOHAMMED ABD EL-AZIM HILAL
        MECHANICAL ENGINEER
     CSWIP 3.1 - NDT (RT- MT - PT)
OTISHAN CONSULTANT ENGINEER
  00966-502612218  00966-502612218  -   0020103124557  0020103124557


--- On Tue, 6/29/10, george.dilintas@gr.bureauveritas.com <george.dilintas@gr.bureauveritas.com> wrote:

From: george.dilintas@gr.bureauveritas.com <george.dilintas@gr.bureauveritas.com>
Subject: Re: [MW:5791] MPI vs DPI
To: "materials-welding" <materials-welding@googlegroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 29, 2010, 7:06 PM


Mpi  can be used only on ferromagnetic materials


----- Original Message -----
From: Amir Zakee Adnal [amirzakee@gmail.com]
Sent: 29/06/2010 16:52 ZE5
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Subject: [MW:5787] MPI vs DPI



Dear all
What is/are major difference between MPI and DPI? Can MPI be
substitute with DPI? Is there any code or standard that allow such
substitution?

Regards,
Amir Zakee

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

No comments:

Re: [MW:34913] Filler wire

E71T-1C  is Charpy Impact tested at -20degC E71T-1CJ is Charpy impact tested at -40degC. AWS Classification for FCAW is only a supplementary...