Skip to main content

Re: [MW:4829] Radiographic film interpretation

 
If your radiographic density determinations are correct, result a slight negative radiographic contrast (-0.04, very close of the  threshold of human eye perception: 0.02).
This means to evaluate the following possible imperfections:
1. weld:
    a. metallic inclusions (tungsten or copper,depending the welding process);
    b. weld spatter;
    c. a small higher thickness.
2. film handling and manipulation (artifacts).
 
All the other imperfections possible in welds create a positive radiographic contrast (including LoF).
 
Imperfections 1.b); c) and 2. can be easy verified by VT of weld  or viewing, by reflexion, the surface of the film.
Imperfection 1.a):
- tungsten inclusion, specific for TIGW, creates a high negative contrast indication (> - 0.2, depending the radiation source energy) and can not be considered.
-copper inclusion create a small negative contrast indication (a little higher specific weight than steel) and can be considered.
There are not acceptance criteria depending the contrast. This helps, only,  for imperfection (discontinuity) diagnosis.
A UT discontinuity indication of 20 % DAC (DAC-14 dB) is not important (considered, for example, by EN 1713 as insignificant and by ASME VIII, app. 12 at the upper limit of non-evaluation), so could be associated to the upper mentioned copper inclusion.
 
   
 


--- On Thu, 4/15/10, Shashank Vagal <nach_sam@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Shashank Vagal <nach_sam@yahoo.com>
Subject: [MW:4850] Radiographic film interpretation
To: materials-welding@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 5:46 PM

Hi all,
In one RT film we have a 10-12 mm spot with density 3.13. The weld density is 3.17 and the parent metal density is 3.3. It is apparently interpass LoF in the 2nd fill pass after hot pass (confirmed by UT, where the indication ht is approx 20%of DAC). Is there any or what is the criteria for acceptance/rejection based on density difference?
Rgds,
Shashank Vagal

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re: [MW:34105] SA266 GR4N 4 Cycle SPWHT

Hi,  You are correct, Minimum refers to the one cycle for which this part will expose until final work shop PWHT. hence mill test certificate shall include this.  Max. SPWHT, refers to additional cycles of heat treatment that are reserved for future repairs during equipment lifetime.  Again, these simulated no. Of cycles shall be specified in MTC.  The idea is we need to make sure that steel mechanical properties are not compromised upon exposure to multiple repairs (i e 4 cycles in your case).  One could say, if steel is subjected to 4 cycles and is ok, then it should by defacto be good for one cycle, yet, this is wrong assumption cause mechanical problems and microstructure of materials varies accordingly based on no. Of cycles for which material will expose. This is apparent in alloy steel and especially for impact test values as an example.  In your case, this forged CS with properties before PWHT can be understood to be " as forged" condition (i.e. Wit...

Materails FAQs

Q: What are equivalents for standard Q 235 B (and Q 235 A) for U-channels? (asked by: boris.vielhaber@vait.com) A: DIN Nr. = 2393 T.2, 2394 T.2, EN 10025 W. Nr. DIN 17007 = 1.0038 Design DIN 17006 = RSt 37-2, S235JRG2 (Fe 360 B) Q: What is St DIN 2391 BK material? (asked by: dmcandrews@automaticstamp.com) A: Precision steel tubes, cold-finished/hard. Q: What is C.D.W. Boiler Tube? (asked by: montydude123@yahoo.com) A: Cold Drawn Welded Boiler Tube. Q: WHAT IS W.Nr. 1.4301? PLS TELL US IN EASY LANGUAGUE (asked...

Heat tint (temper) colours on stainless steel surfaces heated in air // Heat tint

Introduction The colour formed when stainless steel is heated, either in a furnace application or in the heat affected zone of welds, is dependent on several factors that are related to the oxidation resistance of the steel. The heat tint or temper colour formed is caused by the progressive thickening of the surface oxide layer and so, as temperature is increased, the colours change.   Oxidation resistance of stainless steels However, there are several factors that affect the degree of colour change and so there is no a single table of colour and temperature that represents all cases. The colours formed can only be used as an indication of the temperature to which the steel has been heated. Factors affecting the heat tint colours formed Steel composition The chromium content is the most important single factor affecting oxidation resistance. The higher the chromium, the more heat resistant the steel and so the development of the heat tint colou...