Saturday, April 10, 2010

[MW:4770] AWS D1.1

Hi everybody;

According to AWS D1.1 3.13.4 Fİgure 8 in structural steel projects.CJP
is written in that.Is complete penetration required in back up weld
area?.
For example;PQR specimen is welded but according to UT results , there
are defects only in backup weld area.Is it allowable?.
Is backup weld area partial penetration??

Annex K:
BACK UP WELD(Tubular Structures):The initial closing pass in a CJP
groove weld,made from one side only,which serves as a backing for
subsequent welding,but is not considered as a part of the theoretical
weld(Figures 3.8 through 3.10,Details C and D)


Serdar KOLDAS
Mechanical Engineer B.Sc.

--
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.

To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.

No comments:

Re: [MW:34913] Filler wire

E71T-1C  is Charpy Impact tested at -20degC E71T-1CJ is Charpy impact tested at -40degC. AWS Classification for FCAW is only a supplementary...