Sunday, November 1, 2009

[MW:3574] Re: min thickness qualified in AWS D1.1

Hi,
 
Below 16 mm if impact is not required by design , then you can put qualified range from 3.2 mm  instead of 16,
 
The limitation because of heat input and rate of coling will play vital role when Impact required  ,
 
You cannot genaralise the above factors for below 16 mm and above 16 mm .
 
 
 


 
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Ali Asghari <asghariali@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Hi All
1-does anybody know why AWS is given a limitation for min thickness qualified if charpy is carried out for wps qualification?(according to table 4.6)
i suppose that the max thickness is critical for toughness.
2-now for written qualification range for thickness in wps,i must follow table 4.6 or 4.2
regards
 




Thanks & regards,

K.Babu
Singapore

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to materials-welding-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group's bolg at http://materials-welding.blogspot.com/
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

No comments:

[MW:34866] Presentation for WPS ,PQR AND WPQ as per ASME Sec IX in power point

Dear Experts.        If anyone having presentation of WPS,PQR and WPQ  as per ASME  SEC.IX  in power point then please share . Regards Sanja...