Preparing, testing bend samples
Almost all welding codes require bend tests for welding procedures and welder qualifications. These tests can cause more problems in aluminum than in steel.
In bend testing, a 1 1/2-inch-wide sample is cut so the weld is running across the width of the sample. Then the sample is bent around a specified radius, with either the root or the face of the weld in tension. The bend usually is made using a radiused plunger that pushes the sample down into a radiused female die.
Sometimes I make aluminum bend test samples that bend only 30 or 40 degrees and then snap. What's going on?
This isn't uncommon in aluminum bend tests. A sample that has broken this way is shown in Figure 1. The sample started to bend a little bit in the die and then snapped abruptly.
The reason it snapped is shown in Figure 2. The dark gray line in the lower left part of the photo is the remnant of a fine defect in the weld caused by lack of fusion.
This is the first thing you should look for in a failed bend sample. Any lack of fusion in the weld, no matter how small, will make the sample snap on bending. When a sample snaps, don't blame the welding wire or the parent material; a defect almost certainly is in the weld.
But wait. You radiographed the test plate before you cut the bend samples from it. Why didn't you see the lack of fusion on the radiograph?
Lack-of-fusion discontinuities in aluminum usually are tight and don't show up well on radiographs. It's fairly common to miss lack of fusion in a radiograph of an aluminum weld. The bend test is more discriminating.
I don't see any lack of fusion in the bend test sample, but it still fails. Why?
Aluminum alloys are different from steels in several ways. One of these ways is that aluminum alloys and aluminum welds aren't as ductile as steels. For this reason, the bend radius required for aluminum alloy bend tests usually is larger than that required for steel samples.
Don't guess. Check the code you will use in production. You often will find that you're bending samples around a too-small radius, which almost guarantees failure.
A special case allows for the limited ductility of welds in 6000 series alloys, such as 6061-T6. If these bend samples are machined to the standard thickness of 3/8 in., they often fail.
The major welding codes recognize this. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Section IX, while not explicit, allows you to machine 6061 or 6063 samples down to 1/8 in. thick for testing (QW-466.1). American Welding Society D1.2 specifically states that welds in M23 materials (6000 series alloys) should either be tested as-welded, with the bend sample machined to 1/8 in. thick, or annealed before testing with the sample machined to 3/8 in. thick (paragraph 22.214.171.124). Many fabricators and welders are unaware of these exceptions and continue to fail procedure and performance qualifications needlessly.
The other major difference between welds in aluminum alloys and those in steels is that a weld in steels normally is about the same strength as the surrounding material, while in aluminum alloys, the weld and the adjacent heat-affected zone (HAZ) usually are much weaker than the surrounding material.
When a relatively homogeneous steel sample is bent in a plunger-type bend tester, the sample bends smoothly. If an aluminum sample is bent in the same tester, the relatively weak HAZ bends sharply, with little or no bending in the rest of the sample. The HAZ then kinks and finally fractures at the crack before the rest of the sample deforms at all.
The way to prevent these failures is not to use a plunger-type tester for aluminum samples. Both D1.2 and Section IX allow the use of wraparound bend testers. In fact, the 2002 version of D1.2 specifically will state that the wraparound tester is the preferred type for aluminum bend tests.
For those who aren't familiar with this type of bender, it's similar to a small rotary draw bender used to bend tubing. In use, one end of the sample is restrained. The swing arm then pulls the sample around a die with the proper radius. These testers are shown schematically in Figure 4.15 of D1.2 and in QW-46.3 of Section IX.
A few additional factors can cause bend samples to fail needlessly. All codes allow the four corners of the bend sample to be radiused. Take the time to perform this extra operation. Sharp corners often start cracks that will cause failure.
It's also important to take care to get a smooth surface finish on the sample. The weld reinforcement must be removed completely by machining. Even a small notch at the weld toe (on a face bend) or at the edge of the weld root can cause bend test failure.
Even though it might sound like overkill, make sure any machining marks are along the length of the sample. Believe it or not, machining marks that go across the width of the sample can act as starting points for cracking during testing.
Friday, December 26, 2008
Preparing, testing bend samples
Posted by BR at 9:41 AM
- [MW:1387] Welder qualification
- [MW:1391] BRAZING CS tube sheet to copper tube WPS...
- Quality inspections-Ensuring a top notch weld insp...
- Fatigue Failures
- Weld inspection before you weld-Using procedure qu...
- First line of defense-Educating welders to achieve...
- Entering a new phase in weld inspection-An introdu...
- A review of common nondestructive tests-Assessing ...
- Understanding weld discontinuities
- What welding inspectors should know about welding ...
- Radiographic and ultrasonic weld inspection-Establ...
- Material guidelines-Properties and characteristics...
- The fundamentals of gas tungsten arc welding: Prep...
- [MW:1392] CVN Impact exemption on PQR as per UCS 6...
- Tips for TIG torches-Simplifying torch assembly
- Joining aluminum with GTAW: Advice for the novice
- How to Improve Your Welds: Helpful hints for GMAW
- [MW:1393] Re: CVN Impact exemption on PQR as per U...
- [MW:1394] FW: Call for Registeration- National Wel...
- [MW:1395] Re: Calibration, Validation of welding m...
- GMAW vs. FCAW for beginners: Choose the best proce...
- Using narrow-gap GTAW for power-generation equipme...
- 10 frequently asked GTAW questions-Answers and exp...
- MIG welding tips and resources
- TIG welding - an overview
- The shocking truth about welding-A closer look at ...
- Guidelines for tungsten electrodes-Identifying, se...
- Arc welding discontinuities
- P is for plasma, precision-Requirements, qualities...
- Seeing GTAW through a new lens-Gas lens basics and...
- Welding austenitic stainless steel-Tips for optima...
- Welding ASTM A514 or A514M-05 steel?-Before you do...
- Stuck on SMAW?-Easy answers to 8 common electrode ...
- Great welds need the right gas
- The whats, whys, and whens of GTAW
- Tips for troubleshooting GMAW consumables-Gun and ...
- The lowdown on low-alloy filler metals-Your option...
- Welding hazards and how to prevent them
- GTAW common joint designs
- TIG for titanium tubing-Success hinges on filler m...
- [MW:1396] Re: Calibration, Validation of welding m...
- Microstructure of Steel
- [MW:1397] RE: 1312] Re: 1307] Re: 1305] welding re...
- [MW:1398] Equivalent PWHT
- [MW:1399] Re: Equivalent PWHT
- [MW:1400] Re: Equivalent PWHT
- [MW:1401] Interpass temperature measurement.
- [MW:1402] Re: Equivalent PWHT
- [MW:1403] Re: 1312] Re: 1307] Re: 1305] welding re...
- [MW:1404] Re: Interpass temperature measurement.
- [MW:1405] Re: Interpass temperature measurement.
- [MW:1406] Re: Equivalent PWHT
- [MW:1407] GOST 1050-88 CT 3
- [MW:1408] Branch components.
- [MW:1409] Re: GOST 1050-88 CT 3
- [MW:1410] Comparison of Vacpack electrode
- [MW:1412] Re: Comparison of Vacpack electrode
- [MW:1411] Re: Comparison of Vacpack electrode
- Metallographic Sectioning
- [MW:1413] Re: Interpass temperature measurement.
- [MW:1414] welding reqd on a weldolet
- [MW:1415] Re: welding reqd on a weldolet
- Resolving the challenges of welding coated steels
- [MW:1416] Re: welding reqd on a weldolet
- [MW:1417] Missing Information about reference to E...
- [MW:1418] ASME B31.3-2006 Ed. Fig. 328.5.2.c
- [MW:1420] Re: ASME B31.3-2006 Ed. Fig. 328.5.2.c
- [MW:1419] Re: ASME B31.3-2006 Ed. Fig. 328.5.2.c
- [MW:1421] Re: ASME B31.3-2006 Ed. Fig. 328.5.2.c
- [MW:1422] PWHT Requirement for clad plate vessel
- [MW:1423] Re: PWHT Requirement for clad plate vess...
- [MW:1424] Re: PWHT Requirement for clad plate vess...
- [MW:1427] Tray support ring on overlay
- Will your weld hold up? Discovering and preventing...
- Submerged arc welding : then and now
- Tips for TIG torches
- Metallurgical aspects of tube production
- Preparing, testing bend samples
- Modified GMAW for root passes
- Joining GMAW and GTAW
- SMAW Basicsâ€”How much do you know?
- First line of defense-Educating welders to achieve...
- Titanium You can weld it!
- Carbon content, steel classifications, and alloy s...
- Welding's effect on strengthening steel
- Making steels stronger
- It's all about why
- Welding cold-rolled steel to cast iron
- The root causes of weld defects
- Tack Welding
- Welding Symbols: A Useful System or Undecipherable...
- Failure Avoidance in Welded Fabrication
- Low Voltage Short Circuiting-GMAW
- Heat Treatment - What Is It?
- [MW:1425] Inspecting inaccessible piping -LRUT
- [MW:1426] NDT
- [MW:1428] Re: ASME B31.3-2006 Ed. Fig. 328.5.2.c
- [MW:1429] Re: ASME B31.3-2006 Ed. Fig. 328.5.2.c
- [MW:1430] Re: PWHT Requirement for clad plate vess...
- [MW:1431] RE: 1430] Re: PWHT Requirement for clad ...
- ▼ December (125)
- ► 2009 (2497)
- ► 2010 (5182)
- ► 2011 (4336)
- ► 2012 (3034)
- ► 2013 (3341)
- ► 2014 (2939)
- ► 2015 (1678)
- ► 2016 (1833)